Jump to content

J-Foppa

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    157

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Everything posted by J-Foppa

  1. J-Foppa
    You have got to be f-ing kidding right? How can you say you wont stand for the decision that LA made. Saying it was a majority and you are not part of the blame. Spineless imo. STOP writing shit like "there was contradicting opinions" etc. We are not children, we do not need to know that decisions are not always black or white and we really really don't care if you are 5-0 or 3-2 in the decision making. Sorry but its pathetic to excuse yourself...and even worse to blame your fellow LA-mates.
  2. J-Foppa
    Yeah probably, but after some reading I dont find any support in the rules for such decision. In fact, section 7 regarding scheduling states "All league games must be finished 7 days after the end of the regular season schedule. This rule might not apply in case an individual solution needs to be found according to the procedure described above. In case there are any unplayed games after this deadline, the administration will investigate the issue and hand out walkover wins for the team that was more active in trying to get the games scheduled and played in time." It says walkover wins. If you interpret that both teams are equally at fault this would render one win each. This interpretation is also established by LA by all the earlier decisions in previous ECL-tournaments. The loss/loss situation is explained under the definitions section. However, such a section should not really contain a new rule...and definitely not one that contradicts a rule under its specific section. Definitions are there to clarify terms used in the rules, not dictate new ones. Anyway I guess it doesnt matter that much, but Im a firm believer in sticking to the set rules and not wing decisions as you see fit. I would really like a comment from LA on why the wrote a contradictory rule under the definitions section and then chose to give that rule precedence over the specific rule quoted above. @gzell60 @Kenu @Ranksu
  3. J-Foppa
    Yes but never been an elite league like this and the rule about 0 points to both teams is apparently new as well.
  4. J-Foppa
    Yeah its actually in the rules. Never seen it enforced though. The problem is that teams are not able to select opponents. But that will probably be fixed next season I hope
  5. J-Foppa
    How is it possible to hand out 0 points in 2 games?
  6. J-Foppa
    It is a good point! The deal is this; what is more important? A) Player integrity and following rules as individuals (including code of conduct) B) Tournament as a whole (Teams finnishing and not forfeiting). If you deem that B is more important than you also need to allow teams to take measures when A happens (i.e. individual players fuck up). Those measures could ofc be regulated as well so for example you are only allowed to draft the same amount of FA as players who are banned.
  7. J-Foppa
    I remember very well the discussion that took place between me Koffe and Basstian when the original xbox rulebook was revised. We had a lengthy discussion about captains roles, responsibilties as well as privileges. At the time being, one of the problems we faced were teams that dissolved after captains abandoned their teams. Therefore we instated the rule of no trades for C and As. I was very persistent that this also meant that captains and assistant captains could not be sacked from the team. Because if you impose a prohibitary rule you also need to balance that with a beneficiary rule, or it will only become a burden. Today the community had not only merged with Playstation but has also grown considerably, and the rulebook has expanded. I feel that the admins of today sometimes forgott to balance the rules. Its easy to forbid this forbid that, but you also need to motivate people to take that responsibility. I think I can speak for the other GM's of Synergy (We are 4 at the moment, sometimes 5) when I say we consider it a burden, and we keep rotating the captaincy. Imo there is no benefit to be a captain. Unless every member of your team leave and you can "sell" your division spot to new teammates.
  8. J-Foppa
    Relax. No one said Totalli's action was okay. But I think I speak for more than myself when asking where the line is? If I just read your reply here I take it its fine to make fun of opponents with videos. Taunting is usually connected with some type of humour. Its okay even when your motive is to provoke and you even say so out clear?
  9. J-Foppa
    Memory is good but short no? At least I remember someone writing a bunch of stuff after some decisions last ECL. Also we are not commenting saying decisions are wrong, but being members of the community we are interested in learning the boundaries of what is considered okay and not. Nothing wrong with that.
  10. J-Foppa
    Yeah I get that, and Im sure Totalli is not serious about someone being autistic either...so question remains, where is the silver lining?
  11. J-Foppa
    I dont know but that does not seem kosher to me.
  12. J-Foppa
    Yes I agree. And I might be totally off here but didnt Muki post a video provoking it? Someone even wrote they welcomed drama...and that is fine? Does it mean I can make fun of my opponents with videos and if they respond they get 10 games? Again, I dont know what happened...but I would like clarification about the code of conduct rule...since I am the one who wrote the goddamn rule in 2012, and it seems it is interpreted differently today.
  13. J-Foppa
    He get 10 games for that? And I thought I was harsh as tgma. Hedlund you here? Look how you were treated with silk gloves
  14. J-Foppa
    I dont speak finnish very well. I know like 5 words. So I dont understand what happened in Muki - Sky case. Can someone elaborate? Totalli posted a picture in response to a video?
  15. J-Foppa
    Just curious, what are the benefits of being a captain since it is listed together with the games ban in punishments? Im not trying to be rude, I think it is a valid question.
  16. J-Foppa
    The mystery of finnish luck has finally been solved hoho!
  17. J-Foppa
    Synergy 3-1 goal against Limitless! Upload @Supremski
  18. J-Foppa
    Yes I do agree! Also beating you as Drunken Rebels makes you even more angry Win win
  19. J-Foppa
    And you are doing what? They specifically asked us to comment...and we should...not comment? What is your point? I was not critizing, I made a remark that Club name seem more important than roster. If I should critizise it will go something like this: Letting Unknown take over Northern Ascendancy means any team can go to the elite if they draft the captain of a Elite team. In Unknowns case I still feel its motivated since NA and Unknown are very similar teams with both Anrh and Foppatofflan playing for NA. Howere it does create a precedential case in forthcoming situations that might not fit the glove as well as NA/WHO. Letting NL keep their spot with 1 previous member and a former sacked assistant captain mean I could just add an irl friend who never played the game. Put him as captain and protect the club name. Again...this is not crying but valid input to make the tournaments even better in the future. Im sure such input is more appreciated among admins then "stop crying" remarks! hugs and kisses xoxo
  20. J-Foppa
    I guess the club name is important. 4 ex synergy players form Dead end Kings and get placed in lite. Nordic Lightning has 2 players from their previous team (where 1 of them got kicked) still get to keep their Elite spot. Anyway good luck to everybody
  21. J-Foppa
    Synergy is looking for 1 (or 2) fwds for the upcoming ECL 4. We will be participating in the elite division. Position is not very important as our other fwds can play different positions, but being able to play two positions is always nice. Send me a pm here or psn msg if you want a tryout.
  22. J-Foppa
    Go for it! Maybe even some commentators as well?
  23. J-Foppa
    Laser HT - Northern Ascendancy 4-1Written In The Stars - Finnish Roosters 2-4Aapon Taikasauvat - MUKIMIEHET 4-2X-Factor - SIKA 4-2
  24. J-Foppa
    Laser HT - TIKI TALK 4-0Aapon Taikasauva - Fat Cats 4-2Northern Stars - Northern Ascendancy 3-4Written in the Stars - Nordic Nightmare 4-3Synergy Hockey - Muki 4-2X Factor - Dynasty 4-2SIKA - Nordic Lightning 3-4Finnish Roosters - Nordic Blizzard 4-2
  25. J-Foppa
    And this has to do with what?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy