Jump to content

l-Furyan-l

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    499

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

 Content Type 

Posts posted by l-Furyan-l

    Lavetten - Pata Hellalla

    in Archive (hidden)

    Posted

    On 2017-11-25 at 4:18 PM, kungenkurwa said:

    https://nhlgamer.com/match.php?matchID=6651

    this match is now somehow reported two times.

    And we play third match which one Pata Hellalla win 3-1 and i can't reported it. how i can report it? Use the old tool?

    Edit: Now i try to add rest of the games for this series. i can put the stats for game 4 which one Pata Hellalla win 1-0, but after that i try put game 5 stats, it always throw me that game report which i first report.

    I removed the double game. Score in the series is now 2-1 according to the playoff tree but from what I know, you guys won it 4-2 @kungenkurwa? 

    Check if you can use one of the other "game slots" in the API to report the remaining games. I think Lavetten (or you guys) might have used Games 4-7 in the schedule to report the games you played as 1-3 in the series. As long as the home-away teams are correct, you can use a different game.

  4. NHLGAMER SÄNKA SKEPP

    in SportsGamer Feedback & Questions

    Posted

    Då ska vi se hur många taggar man minns och kan få in här xD NOR och Lav verkar redan vara på bollen och FFR, NL, DEK samt Lite har jag för dålig koll på tyvärr, men:

    FCM:

    @iscojr94 @PatzyDrake @LastMandalorian @Onecorner95 @Meeertz @minokin

    SYN:

    @Norpee @Egyptologen @Pelle3000 @Supremski @berbaboon17 @DUNZA @Gustafsson7

    112:

    @pnordetun @JaikenK @Bjono 

    NOS:

    @cHIIMEERa @Rullstolskalas @Floor17 @ma0niii @MajLeN-Gaming

     

    Roistot vs Puck Panthers

    in Archive (hidden)

    Posted

    @kazams17 - do you have player stats for both teams as well?

    Looks like we will have to delete this game as there is nothing added and the penalties are quite wrong (one team has 18 penalties registered...). Once the game is deleted, you will have to report the game again using the API if possible, but otherwise using the old tool.

    Please confirm that you have the player stats and we will delete the game.

  13. Game Matrix

    in SportsGamer Feedback & Questions

    Posted

    Okay @MartindalexC, I've been sitting on the sidelines for most of the posts where you put down NHLGamer but there are a few things I felt the need to adress here. To make it easier for myself, I am going to stay mostly within the parameters of "content" as I cant really comment on the parts that relates to coding.

    "Write what you know", as the saying goes.

    First of all, the continous comparison to Valve throughout your post is not only grossly unfair (a company valued at 2-4 billion dollars with hundreds, if not thousands, of staffers vs. 10 guys who are - at best - available at different times of the day, outside of working regular jobs and spending time with families/partners/kids), it is also flawed in the sense that with Valve you are paying quite a substantial amount of money for specific products which absolutely puts you in a position where you can demand better if the specific products you payed for arent living up to the billing. Note that I am not saying that you don't have the right to demand excellence from us as well, having a critical voice is often good to keep you on your toes, it is just that your tone is perceived by most us as quite demeaning as you are seemingly suggesting that we are not doing our absolutely darndest to make this an enjoyable place to be. That isn't exactly inspiring.  

    What you are looking at right now with NHLGamer is a free-to-use "product" that is currently being run by a limited staff, on their free time, fueled by nothing other than the passion for hockey gaming and the urge to create something cool for both regular users and complete newcomers to the NHLGamer community. Maybe that balance has been shifted towards newcomers a bit lately, it is actually possible. We have seen quite the increase in our membership totals so perhaps the correlation is that the more time and focus spent on welcoming newcomers, the more members are enticed to join. Does that mean the focus will not shift back to putting our core, regular members in focus? Absolutely NOT. Never, in my opinion. The core community is just that, core, and should never be forgotten.

    I do think you are coming at this very much from your point of view as a member of the core community who's been around for years. That makes sense, what other view would you have? I was the same when I came here. If you look at some of the error report threads from back in 15/16 I was one of the more vocal guys in pointing out errors and stuff. While that is valuable information and will continue to be helpful, you know what is tremendously more helpful? Actually joining up to work on the website. I saw plenty of flaws in the website (one of them being the lack of "journalistic" content) so I decided to join up to help create some. You seem to be a man with a very specific vision for how the website should be run, you are most welcome to join on a Skype call with the rest of the Staff to tell us how you can help out in making the website better than it currently is.

    Moving on, you are mostly right that there hasn't been any major features added to the website since the website re-modeling and API addition in March (even though I would argue giving hundreds of Russians the ability to participate in 6v6 gaming on NHLGamer is a pretty major one) but that is mostly because the Staff have been focusing on various other ways of improving the NHLGamer experience. We have been talking to sponsors (which we managed to get for the Summer Cup), expanding our presence in social media and news outlets and finally partnering up with major players in the gaming landscape to create tournaments with cash prizes involved. Now, I get that this maybe isn't the priority that you personally would have wanted, but with a limited staff we can only do so much and be in so many places at once before we crumble.

    Furthermore, the links you posted are ABSOLUTELY content. Again, maybe not the content you personally would have gone for, but it is content and to call it anything other than what it is, is quite insulting to the people who have spent days or hours or in the case with the video, WEEKS, on creating it. Having the site look nice and having articles that "look good to outsiders" isn't in any way, shape or form an attempt to steer the project away from improving the experience for the regular ECL player to instead having just "surface shit" as you make it sound, it is simply a case of the coding making the site look nice and the articles perhaps being more journalistically styled than player-to-player due to the writer behind them prefering to write it that way. Again, I respect if this isn't your cup of tea or if you feel that our focus should be shifted to other areas, but there needs to be an aspect of fun involved in creating stuff for the website because if you just expect people to "grunt" through the work like you might at a regular everyday job, you'd soon find the Staffs numbers dwindling even further down.

    As for the "writers room thing", you know why I created that article (if you'll allow me to get a bit personal)? It was because I wanted and needed help. I created the article in combination with Max because we both felt like we needed help with writing articles that could be fun for the community to read (again, the initiative stemmed from a want to create enjoyment within the community) because we both found it increasingly difficult to juggle the 4-8+ hours it sometimes takes creating a proper article with our everyday lives. Again, it was not an attempt to take focus away from anything else, it was a simple call for help because many of us had previously worked ourselves to exhaustion trying to create things for the community.

    You know how many people expressed an interest in helping out with the Writers Room? 4. You know how many have written more than a single article? 1. Actually I am just in the process of editing that writers work and you will most likely see the first parts of his 6-part series released next week. You say we have lost content from previous ECLs. Maybe we have. Speaking for myself, I simply havent had the time I used to, to produce proper content (or not-content, as you called it) this ECL. When I created and wrote all of the "Whos hot and Whos not", they each took 8-10 hours (if not more) to research, write and release. Having a writers room would have cut down on that, but sadly it was not to be.

    Maybe I am drifting off topic, apologies if so. I do think your post has merit even if I disagree with how you voice your concerns.

    I just very much take offense to the picture you are trying to paint where you make it seem that the Staff isnt doing enough... when I know that more than one of us have invested considerable sums of money in the project, not to mention enough time to work ourselves into the wall a few times over just trying to create the best possible NHLGamer website we can.

    Now, about that Skype call...? ;)

    • Like 2

    Xbox ECL 2 - Registrations

    in ECL (XB1) Registrations

    Posted

    22 minutes ago, Tümä said:

    Seriously not even 1 team interested?What's wrong with this platform?

    @Tümä - There was about 8 teams who played in Xbox ECL 1 just a few months ago. The Playstation community is at least 10x larger than the Xbox community (if not more) but there are a few Xbox teams here. We hope to have them register at their earliest convenience so that we can start Xbox ECL 2. Due to the low amount of teams, we are keeping registrations open until we have at least 8 teams. If you know any team or any person who would like to help out in running this league, you are more than welcome to apply.

    As for your comment regarding "whats wrong with the platform", there I dont understand what you mean.

    Hopefully this reply helps you :)

    SK-BB

    in Archive (hidden)

    Posted

    Haha damn, umm.. okay.

    So, I deleted the 1-0 game (https://nhlgamer.com/match.php?matchID=5342) completely. There should now be one matchup between BB - SK left to report as I assume the SK 5-0 Win is all correct in reporting.

    So, for this 3-2 (OT) win for SK @Ollizhki, you need to go to https://nhlgamer.com/add_match.php and click "Add Stats" on the BB-SK game that is now unreported. This means you will be using the Old Tool for this process. Once you click add stats, you add 3-2 OTW as the correct game result. 

    Then, you need to combine all the stats/screenshots from the different games (this you need to do manually) to finally enter the combined sum of these three games in the game report.

    Then, you do the same for your teams individual stats and the goal and penalty events.

    Once you are all done with your part, you alert the Banterfield captaincy squad that they need to add their individual stats and goal/penalty events using the Old Tool. If they use https://nhlgamer.com/add_match.php once you are finished reporting, they should only have the option to "Add individual Stats".

    Phew.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy