MartindalexC

I only play on one account and my pass assistance switched to 100 a few weeks ago, but aside from that there's been no other changes.

They'll be using Synergy

You don't have to be 'good' / skilled to play with the team and pass.

+ it being shit and boring as fuck to play with players who can barely skate straight. Playing with people like that straight up is not fun, unless you're just looking to club some seals which isn't fun for me personally. I played a drop in for the first time in over 2 yrs last night and sweet baby Jesus of Nazareth what a team I got... a C that couldn't take a draw and blue lined, a rw that didn't know that the r2 trigger is a thing and a ld that took so long to pass you'd think he was in a retirement home.

Northern Ascendancy ...esports men (Elite) Acquistions: Haldeem (LD) from Carlsberg (So hands off motherfuckers )

wat

??????????? Don't state opinion as fact then? And where is this stuff about me hating bots? Ask rusty, we love them here at nor

I rest my case then

idynahui

*rash b men fawkin nuub

Ah.... The silver's handbook

1. "There are either bots or other players on the ice", this applies to csgo as a comp game type means 5v5 (players & bots). 2. Bots in csgo are programmed to be FUCKING RETARDED and that's not an understatement, third party hosts such as faceit change the bots so they're not so detrimental to the team. Not sure what point this is making though in regards to justifying why the game is "scripted" (don't think you know what this means). 3. Rip. And there are some rules, granted they're mostly based around managing an economy. Thing is I don't know what argument you are trying to make, if you were to say that in 'competitive' fps / nhl there are no bots then you are correct, but you can't then justify stuff being "scripted" because "how are bots supposed to behave". I don't think you guys grasp what RNG actually means either honestly. NHL is RNG reliant as fuckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk. Take a shot? Well that's rng as it takes your input, skating direction, stick direction probably, and last but not least your players inherent shooting accuracy and power. Puck reception? Lol, again how is this not rng? You can't get better at receiving passes to the point where you will pick it up 100 times out of 100 because the game straight up doesn't allow you to. Picking up loose pucks, especially near the boards / near other players? Yea, again how is this not rng? You are completely reliant on your guy sticking out his dick and picking that shit up. You can't trigger the animation, you can't change the speed of it, you can't control shit. In cs if you use an awp you can control your (in)accuracy based off of your movement, if you have bad movement you can't be as mobile and will have to rely on a small, but albeit significant, amount of rng for your shots to hit (e.g.: if you can't counterstrafe quickly don't even try entrying with an awp). Goalie saves? Hands up if you're a goalie and you've been in perfect positioning (and I mean, perfect, no previous movement, stationary, no screen et cetera) and the puck went straight through your pad. I get where you're coming from with the positioning argument but you're mis-intrepretting having good positioning and being lucky, that's not to say that being in good position is not a skill, because it absolutely is, just not in the ways you guys are thinking about.

I wish the playmaker had any form of balance / strength, the fucker is so nice to use but he gets jostled off the puck like a geriatric waiting for a hip replacement.

Ikr, fuck him for disrupting this idyllic tournament / site

The thing is though playing two games is essentially implied, sure you can argue that it was never discussed but at some point you have to take into account the fact that the two game minimum is pretty heavily assumed by all players I'd wager. Ergo the onus to say that there's gonna be more / less games resides completely with AF.

Who the fuck plays only one game?

What? So Flyer can't understand sarcasm and now you are innumerate? Nice Last time I checked: https://nhlgamer.com/player.php?playerID=1275 13 > 2, although the math may not check out, not sure.

He's pretty shit at being a benchwarmer then if he's starting most games

If you truly thought my previous post was sincere then shit dude, are sarcasm detectors dlc in finland or are you just a little on the slow side of things?

"Registered members are expected to treat each other with respect by not diverting to overly abusive language. This applies to all league/tournament related conversations conducted on NHLGamer.com, or direct communication between players on external sources if proof can be provided that also includes the context of the conversation." Ranka pls ban bad men

*an idiot Signed, not an idiot Edit: If you're gonna call someone an idiot, atleast try not to sound like a retard yourself.

Alright let's see: ---------------------------- (Calls people stupid for, well... being stupid. This is barely even negative.) ---------------------------- (Chimera stated how he thought it was a mystery Lain has like 13 'upvotes'. Lain retaliates back since you could construe Chimera's post as an attack.) ---------------------------- (So chimera tells him no one cares about his (Lain's) opinion. So Lain, again, retorts.) ---------------------------- (You come in and tell him to stop being so negative and to not post unless it's positive.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- He called people "dumb". Oh won't someone please think of the children!?!?! Look, I get where you're coming from and I totally understand it. However I feel the need to state it again, atleast Lain has principles that he holds when making his views known. With half the people complaining about the LA decision, I would bet that if this scenario involved two different teams, their tune about how this is the worst decision ever and their feelings that the LA can't be trusted anymore would suddenly decrease to barely a mutter.

You missed his point though, he wasn't complaining about you shitting on the LA. He was complaining because you told him to cut it because he wrote this: " "Great job, LA. I'm not surprised that some people are angry and that some tries to friends with everybody by sucking it up to the teams involved - there's so many dumb people on this earth, some are bound to be on this site as well. Edit: Actually, this is a great way of sorting out the people with some brains and the people who're stupid as **** on this site. Jej!"" You say that he should only post if it's something positive but honestly that's completely fucked. Hell even I've said many times in the past that there's a bunch of yes-men floating around on this site and I don't remember having someone tell me to shut up about it But, whilst the whole 'constructive' criticism would be great, is Lain's comment really as bad (or worse even) as people mindlessly agreeing to stuff previously, simply because "X" said so? It's perhaps demoralising but if I was in Kenu's position I'd absolutely rather have people shitting on random things than people mindlessly saying "that's good shit right there 💯mmmmh💯".

Nothing you can do but sheer persistence, and call everyone and everything retarded, that's what I do anyway

Cama echo chamber