Jump to content

tbnantti

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    117

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

 Content Type 

Everything posted by tbnantti

  1. tbnantti
    Northern Stars - Free From Rodents 4-0Written In The Stars - Nordic Nosebleed 4-0X Factor - Kattiautomatti 4-1Finnish Roosters - Alliance HT 4-0 Nordic Blizzard - murohoki 4-1Dynasty - Knight Aces HC 4-0Refuse To Lose - TIKI TALK 4-3Fat Cats - Inter Iceland 4-1White Trash - Northern Ascendancy 2-4Warriors of Kongo - Nordic Nightmare 0-4HC Checkmate - MUKIMIEHET 2-4Sjukstugan - Nordic Lightning 3-4Rynnäkköviikset - SIKA 0-4Silver Sword Griffins - Synergy Hockey 2-4 Falun Coal Miners - Aapon Taikasauva 0-4No Guts No Glory - Laser HT 0-4
  2. tbnantti
    I agree! In a perfect world there wouldn't be any vagueness in rules. So maybe it does need a revamp. A glitched out goalie definitely needs to be added to the rules. As for the FR v SSG case, only SSG broke the rules by leaving the game.
  3. tbnantti
    Nice work, Sika. I used to love the fact that the community had a bunch of blogs etc. back in the day, and it was always a blast to read through them. Once we transferred over to the PS4, we lost all the blogs and the content has been somewhat lacking. Love it!
  4. tbnantti

    Introducing - ECL Divisions

    tbnantti commented on Kenu's record in ECL

    The same question applies to a team taking a break for a season and returning for the next one: Will the next season be played with 17 teams or will less teams get promoted?
  5. tbnantti

    Introducing - ECL Divisions

    tbnantti commented on Kenu's record in ECL

    Yes, I know, I am very smart.
  6. tbnantti

    Introducing - ECL Divisions

    tbnantti commented on Kenu's record in ECL

    Another thing I would like to add is I don't get the love for the longevity of teams. Sure, I guess it has a certain romantic aspect to it, but players create new teams to up their competitiveness, and to leave teams with bad chemistry either on or off the ice. I'm not sure how implementing a system where creating a new team is discouraging is supposed to increase the competitiveness of the league. Just something to keep in mind.
  7. tbnantti

    Introducing - ECL Divisions

    tbnantti commented on Kenu's record in ECL

    Well, looks like Viktor said what I was trying to say while I was typing my message.
  8. tbnantti

    Introducing - ECL Divisions

    tbnantti commented on Kenu's record in ECL

    Just speculating here, picking 16 teams with the best PPG for Elite right now: Written in the Stars Northern Stars Finnish Roosters X Factor Dynasty Nordic Blizzard Refuse to Lose White Trash Aapon Taikasauva Laser HT SIKA MUKIMIEHET Synergy Hockey Northern Ascendancy Nordic Lightning Nordic Nightmare Pro teams looking for promotion would include Sjukstugan, Fat Cats, Alliance HT etc. Looking through the teams, the skill gap between the worst teams in Elite and the best teams in Pro is minimal and in some cases might even favor the Pro teams. Again, I'm just speculating here, but going through that list I could definitely pick at least two teams that - barring some big transfers - would get relegated 99% of the time. So I guess what i'm saying is that the promotion/relegation without a playoff is fine, but I would like to see that kind of qualification round implemented anyhow.
  9. tbnantti
    I kind of agree with Jesus here. In a perfect world, the division system would benefit everyone. However, as it is, it will cater to the elite/top teams and completely disregard the needs of the mid- to low-tier teams. What do they want/need? I agree with everything Jesus has said about the skill gap becoming wider and wider because people don't want to join the teams that aren't in the top division. The division system will create its own ecosystem of top players and teams and isolate the rest of the players and teams out. I completely understand why the top teams and players want that, but what will it do for the community? We need fresh blood and players with motivation. I'm all for playing more meaningful games, but for the rest of the community "meaningful games" might be playing against and challenging the top teams. I don't think the issue is as big as it has been made out to be, but it's something to consider. I personally think the shorter seasons with more groups but all the teams has been the best concept thus far. EDIT: Just to reiterate, on a personal basis I love the fact that I get to play against only the best teams, but I think we should look at the bigger picture - how the division system affects the community as a whole.
  10. tbnantti
    For clarification, here are the seeds going forward. #1 Carlsberg 2,55 #2 NOS 2,46 #3 Nordic Blizzard 2,45 #4 Synergy 2,38 (same group, Synergy wins tiebreaker) #5 Uknighted 2,38 (same group, Synergy wins tiebreaker) #6 The United Knights 2,33 #7 Dynasty 2,27 #8 Sjukstugan 2,25 #9 Nordic Stars 2,25 #10 Aapon Taikasauva 2,23 #11 Finnish Roosters 2,17 #12 Kattiautomaatti 2,04 #13 Ace Holes 2,00 #14 Tiki Talk 1,95 (different group with Ganja Bonanzas, Tiki wins tiebreaker) #15 Ganja Bonanzas 1,95 (different group with Tiki Talk, Tiki wins tiebreaker) #16 Sika 1,75
  11. tbnantti
    I just did the exact same thing and got the same pairs, so they should be correct.
  12. tbnantti
  13. tbnantti
    Finally it feels like Consolehockey again!! The drama
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy