Jump to content

tbnantti

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    117

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

 Content Type 

Everything posted by tbnantti

  1. tbnantti
    Versus is p2p so it's completely dependent on your opponent.
  2. tbnantti
    Old 27-28ms. Now 8ms. Oulu, Finland
  3. tbnantti
    I also think a large part of the issue is the discrepancy between what top players want and what most of the (mostly NA) community in the EA forums wants.
  4. tbnantti
    The poke check is no where near what it was with the beta tuners. I couldn't find anything regarding the poke check in the patch notes, so it has to be tuner based, right? It's a good thing, though, as the poke check penalties were fucking ridiculous in the beta.
  5. tbnantti
    Seems like a lot of people are having trouble. Maybe the problem is geographical? Like I said neither me or my teammates have noticed any difference, but we're all from Finland.
  6. tbnantti
    The server change was for HUT. EASHL has been the exact same.
  7. tbnantti
    What is wrong with identifying players by their PSN ID? I agree with what everyone else said about broadcasts using the username.
  8. tbnantti
    Did SKY get a playoff win from us with the @Buantso move? 😨
  9. tbnantti
    Dr Oetker pizza is way better than all the other pizzas
  10. tbnantti
    Everyone understands what you did. You showed remorse only after getting caught. NHL 20 isn't that far off so just do your time and don't make another mistake.
  11. tbnantti
    It only nerfed the no-blend animation backhand, which was hardly useful in EASHL anyway.
  12. tbnantti
    Nothing.
  13. tbnantti
    It'll be interesting to see what Butterfly Effect can muster up against SKY. They've improved quite a bit lately!
  14. tbnantti
    Solid, unexpectedly thorough answer. 👍🏼 Wish you the best of luck!
  15. tbnantti
    WARNING: Don't go here! These guys are dumb as shit
  16. tbnantti
    What I meant was 13.8 states that regardless of captaincy, members that were involved in the disqualification of their team will be banned. Judging by what's written here, they were. So I don't think it contradicts 13.4 at all.
  17. tbnantti
    I'm not involved in the situation in any shape or form, but I think you're misinterpreting the rules in this instance. Assistant captains don't get a "free pass" to leave a folding team just because 13.4 says so. 13.8 says even other roster players are banned if they're involved in the disqualification. Judging by the LA decision (again, I don't necessarily have all the information needed), there was some monkey business as well. So I don't think it's black and white.
  18. tbnantti
    I feel like the same thing happens every single year. People think the game was at its best out of the box, and the tuner updates are claimed to take the game closer to the previous one. Sometimes people blame the tuner on things the tuner didn't even touch. Play the game and form your own, unbiased opinion.
  19. tbnantti
    I don’t think they should change the rules of hockey. 🤷🏼‍♂️
  20. tbnantti
    That’s because your offense is limited anyway.
  21. tbnantti
    I don’t think it’s as clear cut as merely taking a look at what others use would make it out to be, for example SJK successfully utilizes other player classes amongst their forwards. I think people use PWF now because they have always done so + if your opponent uses PWF’s, at least you’re not ”giving your opponent any leash” by using a possibly inferior build. Everyone should use whatever feels most natural. I switched from playmaker to PWF in NHL 17, and while at first it definitely felt very clunky, I feel like it is the best build at the moment. Jumbo isn’t bad either, though.
  22. tbnantti
    I would understand 5(?) to mean a fifth game is to be played if both teams agree to it. They didn’t. I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree on the matter.
  23. tbnantti
    For regular season, yes, I would agree.
  24. tbnantti
    I have never played just one game, but I still don't think it's outrageous, especially considering it's the playoffs. I have been part of gamedays where the games have been completely rescheduled at the last minute, though, which is somewhat comparable. Like miiso said, it's a bit odd but nothing to get outraged over.
  25. tbnantti
    I don’t see a problem with playing just one game if nothing was agreed up front. I don’t know why one would categorize it as a ”loophole”. The wording in the rule should state that captains must agree to x amount of games when setting them up. If no agreement is made, one game would be the minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy