ahonaattorii

Some hockey dudes grinding a gorilla? Maybe BTW, if someone wants to design a logo for us, send me a msg.

Hello Gamers, I want to introduce you new Finnish team Gorilla Grinders! Average Gorilla is well experienced in competitive hockey, has a huge heart and HORRIFIC sized balls. ROSTER Goalies Baranizer Mikse94 Defense peksi22 peQmon (afk) Forwards ahonaattorii (C) jimmiNOhands (A) anttiko10 (A) See you on the ice!

And this time without jokes Finnish Dude looking for PRO/LITE club. I have most experience as RD but can also play RW or C. Hmmm... and also LD/LW but it may need few days to adjust. Contact me DM or PSN ahonaattorii

Not really sure anymore do i want to grind to ELITE with PRO team... so ELITE teams...call me! ... but if some brave manager of a noob team wants to try his luck, go ahead.... i may read your message.

Experienced Finnish RD looking for club ELITE/PRO. Can also play LD but it takes some time to adapt. Contact me DM or PSN ahonaattorii

This is a good point. But the fact is that this is a competitive virtual hockey community. I think the goal is not to get every european to be a member. Quality of the product is a big factor on this competitive part of gaming on my opinnion. And reliability is big part of that. Tens of minutes breaks in broadcasts because someone drops out is not good. And whole prodcasts being cancelled because guys cant log in is even worse.

I am tempted to see if there would be less lag, down time and other BS at xbox. Psn have done so bad work that i believe xbox cant do worse. That is why my vote is for xbox. I will buy the one ecl is played with.

I buy the one ECL is played on. I have heard stories of xbox beeing more stable than ps. PS has errors and all kind of shit all the time.

Oho i looks like i deleted one chapter there :DDD It doesnt make anyone better. But i believe that in the near future we will have more cup candidates that 2 or 3 and Elite will be tighter on what it comes to top8. And then the meaning of spot on regular season would not be so huge.

Well it is quite simple, If you boys really try you can get it. Just try to think about it. If 3rd and for example 6th team closer on same level, it does not matter as much what team you face on semis or quarts.

It doesn`t change it. But if some teams have to play with shit in their pants with current system because so scared of losing single point or two on regular season, it may have an effect on that. Because value of are you first or second on regular season would not be so big.

Tone down? Oh man you are such an adult. I hope this will change a bit in tournaments to come. I hope we will see more teams that have a shot to win the cup.... just like in real hockey. And another thing is that with current system a team could go trough whole regular season by losing every game and still win a cup.

Yeah it is. But who outside of those 3 teams thinks that this is a good thing? Not majority of viewers or players is my guess.

You don`t get nothing of winning regular season. But i get it if price money is only motivation to play and your team is among those 2-3 teams that can win with this system.

Can you please tell me. Why are you guys sooooo afraid of losing those single points every now and then? It is not the end of the world. And because game really is only 12 minutes long, it is "easy" to play that delaying game. Do we really want to courage teams to do it this much that we give them half points of what team would get from 10-0 win? I also think that difference could be huge. And from viewer(customer???) point os view, i don`t think that would be a bad thing. And if we want to take this sport to a more "serious" direction, we should watch things more from viewers point of view. E: And i took a quick look. There is also elite players who have voted for European point counting system. So i would not be so sure what would the result of vote be, if elite captains would vote for this.

Yeah thats true... i checked AF and Ghetto games and there was 1 point bigger difference. But when there is 50% more points for win i think difference is relatively smaller. GFB have only one OT win, if i remember it right. That means that on that part you have not gained any edge. Still to me that standings looks a bit better. At least those top teams would have lost some points. It so fking stupid that on this point of season some team have lost only ONE POINT :DDD With European point system they would have lost 6 points. On my eye that would tell a bit more that the difference between these teams is not quite sooooooo huge. But to me this is more about ideological stuff than something that you can see from standings. The difference between Hockey Dudes and Football ladies is that hockey Dudes are alla about scoring, kicking ass of opponent and they fight all in for the win. Football ladies are more "lets hope that we don`t lose this one" and everyone have fun...and omg do everything so opponent cant score... then those ladies throw high fives after a nice 0-0 tie.

I my self am surprised of how tight this poll. I don`t think NG will do any changes with these results so we have to wait for more people to realize whats wrong with current system. No offence to Ghetto Firebirds at all.. Great team and specially @Jeresti rox!!! But still, i must mention that look at the Elite standings now... it looks like some lame ass football standings. GF is ahead of teams that have won 50% more than GF. GF is just above playoff line, with one win more than league bottom Almost Famous.

I don`t know should i call him Victor Hedman or Zdeno Karlsson of eHockey. No name seems big enough for a OG commando #16 Sergei Klassikov. So i would very much want to hear a story of @Klassikko_

Aah ok, now i get it. I my self don`t see it as bad thing. I mean if top teams lose few points more. Recent seasons there has been about two teams that lose something like 2-4 points on a whole season. To me that actually seems kind of stupid/boring.

Thanks for your post! Maybe i am just too tired, but i just don`t get it... what would make this underdog team want that one OT point more on 3-2-1-0 system than 2-1-0 system? I would think that underdog has more reasons to try to fight from that single point on 2-1-0 system, because on this system single point is relatively more valuable.

Do we want more exciting OT or more exciting regular time?

The case is not really about that if win gives you just 2 points you would not want to win. The case is that if you would get 3 points of a win, you would want to win even more. I think no one denies this? Your example is ok, but even on that case there is often 3rd or 4th team that these two teams playing want to stay above on standings. Specially at the end of the season you will see this more. I just think that winning some team 10-0 should be way more than one point more valuable than losing to some team on overtime. @tbnantti here gives example that 3 point system is not always better... and guess it is true. Can some tell some examples why or when 2 point of win system is better than 3 point system? And loss is a loss. Why do we give OT loser one point? 2 point of win / 0 point of loss would also be ok system

Hello amigos! Now is the time that this have been heard in conversations around the parties. So from a tip of a friend i thought we can now do a little poll of the case. What do you think, is the current point counting system best? Or could it be better? I personally think that it is now too tempting to play safe and make sure both teams get at least that one point from getting to an overtime. Winning on regular time should be worth more than winning on overtime. Hope you give your opinion to community. Thanks folks. BR, Kose

It was about time!!! GJ JYP!