Leaderboard
-
in Posts
- All areas
- Images
- Image Comments
- Albums
- Album Comments
- Status Updates
- Status Replies
- Blog Entries
- Blog Comments
- News Records
- News Record Comments
- News Records
- News Record Comments
- GCL Records
- GCL Record Comments
- Records
- Record Comments
- Record Reviews
- Records
- Record Comments
- Record Reviews
- Records
- Record Comments
- Record Reviews
- Events
- Event Comments
- Topics
- Posts
-
Year
-
All time
September 15 2015 - June 12 2025
-
Year
June 12 2024 - June 12 2025
-
Month
May 12 2025 - June 12 2025
-
Week
June 5 2025 - June 12 2025
-
Today
June 12 2025
- Custom Date
-
All time
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation since 06/12/24 in Posts
-
56 points
-
Free f for upcoming tournaments ->psn/dc/here dm : tkantola https://sportsgamer.gg/players/222749 points
-
@SportsGamer How hard can it be? Start a poll for Elite and Pro. React with a ๐ if you want to bann Truc, UF and Tipper. (Or other abilities) React with a ๐๐ปif you want to play ECL with all abilities available. Only for players that played in ECL Elite and ECL PRO in ECL Spring Democracy is a good thing48 points
-
Last Dance (prev. Voittamaton) IN: @NikkeDangles @Lxndstrom @Puantso OUT: @Patzlaf @FlyerKungen @temppanen47 points
-
Free C/RD/RW for all upcoming tournaments, contacts preferably via Discord47 points
-
47 points
-
46 points
-
Free G for upcoming tournaments psn: Ricco21-- Discord: ricco21_45 points
-
Free RD (LD) for upcoming tournaments msg here or discord44 points
-
44 points
-
42 points
-
Free f for upcoming tournaments Mainly looking for elite42 points
-
Free rw looking for team (backup role), can play sometimes but ready be humble and work for team success โค๏ธ42 points
-
42 points
-
Free Rw/Rd for upcoming ecl Pro/Elite contact here or Psn easychasniper240 points
-
Kymmeneltรค Baariin Looking for starting RW/LW, LD, Starter G/ 2x 50/50 Gโs Our goal is to make pro qualis! Contact us via discord: hopeakypara99, aaro47 or sirlateksi40 points
-
Parasite IN: @xAaro89x OUT: @NikkeDangles Welcome Aaro๐ฅ๐ค39 points
-
I've been reading this conversationโif you can call it thatโfor a while and have been thinking about writing, so now's the time. There have been some good arguments for both sides and some really uneducated ones that I want to comment on. If you're only going to read the TL;DR and get mad, please also read the paragraph about it before losing your marbles. TL;DR: BS goals close to the net happen with or without close quarters, and defenses should be punished for allowing someone to shoot from that close. It is easy to defend one-tees if you're playing actively and not just standing in front of the net. Goalies will make saves they shouldnโt, with or without traits on the shooter or the goalie. The game auto-aims poke checks ridiculously well, with or without stick 'em up, though stick 'em up does improve aim slightly especially from awkward positions. Truculence makes the "rhino" playstyle too effective, and you can't counter hit after making a play. Banning everything would make passive defending more effective than aggressive defending. -> Let's just stand in front of the net and counter attack, yay free points. A large portion of goals already come from counter attacks, and it's much harder to score in 5v5 offensive zone situations than it is to defend them. Banning traits would only enforce this more. Golden one-tee and golden close quarters don't cause goals against well-structured defensesโthey just punish defensive mistakes. Poor communication on SportsGamer's behalf is a major issue in this situation as well. A lot of people have claimed that close quarters (CC) causes BS goals. It's true that you can score BS goals close to the net with or without CC, and it probably happens slightly more often with it. However, it's also a fact that goalies can absolutely rob you, even when sliding away from the shot and exposing an open netโsomething that, in my experience, happens more often than CC goals. Since CC only activates at close range, I donโt see how itโs unfair for those shots to sometimes go through the goalie. If you allow someone to take a shot from that close, they should have a higher chance of scoring. It's even realistic that shots from close range occasionally trickle through the goalie, and in my opinion, it's a good thing for the game that these shots are rewarded. For the one-tee (1T) trait, I have similar thoughts. As a defender, it's incredibly easy to position yourself in the passing lane and prevent your man from getting 1T shot off. The 1T trait only makes a difference if you're standing right next to the attackerโthen golden 1T might allow a shot that otherwise wouldnโt happen. More importantly, it's fun and rewarding to play active defense rather than just standing in front of the net, especially when thereโs a risk-reward balance in benefit of playing aggressively. Yes, golden 1T allows for some unrealistic shots, but without the 1T threat, defenses tend to clog the middle of the zone, making offensive play more dull and predictable. When scoring becomes too difficult, defenders have no reason to spread out and/or take risks, leading to a game based more on luck than skill, for example, when forcing the puck towards the goal with passes or outside shots. There's also been a lot of discussion about stick 'em up (SEU). I think poke checks in this game are already unrealistically good, even without SEU. For example, if you press R1 while an opponent is mid-deke, the game automatically aims at the puck, regardless of whether you have SEU equipped. With SEU, poke checks can connect slightly better espcially from worse positions, even behind your back, and the manual poke moves a bit faster. Iโve played with both elite and casual players, and Iโve heard complaints about SEU from bothโoften from players who skated straight into a poke check. Thatโs why I think SEU is too often used as a scapegoat for own mistakes. Personally, I donโt care whether itโs banned or not, since it doesnโt drastically alter gameplay like banning 1T would. Some people have said theyโve seen even elite defenders struggle without SEU, but if youโve used a trait for nearly six months, it makes sense that it would take time to adjust even if the change is small. Another hot topic this year has been truculence. Personally, Iโve always preferred gameplay without it. Without trucu, you can still land hits when it's realisticโand even when it's not realistic. But with trucu, you can too often hit someone just by making contact, even if theyโre skating at full speed past you or you're trailing behind them at the same speed. I donโt think itโs overpowered or game breaking, but it does make the rhino playstyle too effective. As for counter hitting, sometimes it works against trucu, and sometimes it doesnโtโbut in many situations, counter hitting isnโt the best move anyway. Often it's smarter to take a hit to make a play rather than trying to counter hit. Also you get penalised too rarely from boarding, charging or interferences after touching the puck so running aroung hitting people with trucu is not my preference of gameplay. I think the biggest issue in all of this is the skill gap, which affects how gameplay feels across different leagues. Iโm speaking from an elite perspective (I'm not above anyone. I'm not the best, nor am I even close, just a nerd about this stuff), where defensive mistakesโlike allowing a wide-open 1T shot or letting someone walk in front of the netโshould be rare. When these mistakes do happen, they should be punished. I don't really know how the gameplay is in lite or core division so I can't really speak on that but for me defensive mistakes should always be punished. The challenge is that elite and pro divisions need to have the same rules, and ideally, every division should follow the same ruleset. One reason elite players are "whining" about this situation is the unbelievably poor communication surrounding these bans. When the first national leagues started, it was easy to predict that traits would also be banned in FCL, and it was likely decided early onโbut why wasn't there an announcement as soon as the decision was made? And if the decision was made at the last second, why wait that long? This could have been decided right after the elite finals, giving players at least two and a half weeks of notice. Communication has always been a huge problem here and I don't understand how it still is after many many years. Banning everything would make passive defending more effective than aggressive defending, leading to fewer quality scoring chances and more skating and passing around the corners. Large part of goals already come from counter-attacks, and it's much harder to score in a structured 5v5 offensive situation than it is to defend one. If scoring becomes even harder, it will lead to more goals from lucky bounces. BS goals will always happen, with or without traits, so banning everything for that reason alone is shortsighted. The one exception in scoring traits, in my opinion, is tipper. Golden tipper can create a meta where players just fire pucks on net from anywhere, making it the most effective strategy. I donโt see why we should ban all golden traits just for the sake of gameplay balance. Doing so would shift the game toward a more passive playstyle, as silver 1T is significantly worse than its golden counterpart. Even with banning golden traits, traits would still be used as scapegoats, and people would still complain and gameplay would swift towards a more passive oneโso no one would actually be happy. Thatโs how compromises work, though, so I understand it. That said, golden 1T and golden CC arenโt causing goals against well-structured defensesโtheyโre just punishing defensive mistakes.39 points
-
Free Lw if something interesting comes up PRO/ELITE I have a 10-game ban, but after that, I'm cleared to play Dm only on discord!38 points
-
38 points
-
๐ฆ Gotham Knights ๐ฆ IN: @LucePro @Jemmuuu @TheSpeedo @jyrki456 @Kussan82 Welcome our new bats!๐ฅ Our team is now ready! ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฆ38 points
-
Free LD (RD) for upcoming tournaments Can try as F too Top Pro/Elite Contact me here or dc: xSnaipperi38 points
-
I have to ask why it will never happen? Every X-Factor is kinda silly in their own way, some being more stupid than others obviously. Anyway, now when EA "removed" Elite Edges, this should be the perfect spot to just ban them all from competitive gameplay, and end this f*cking stupid shitshow circle happening again year after year. No? If I would need to choose, I would go with "ban all" or "don't ban nothing" at this point. I have to agree with message above 100%. I take Kenus side with the decision they've made. He clearly informed 5-6 weeks ago they will probably go with "no-bans" if enough people doesn't stand out. Players saying it was "off-season" is just poor take for me. I understand that, but it's just not enough. Should SG have reminded us about this article? Yes sure, but it's still impossible to blame SG about it or attack towards them. Current situation is our fault and some self-reflection could be made here and there. What makes me the most tired are the toxic messages with zero value on this topic. Don't overreact, sit down, deep breath, analyze the shit and write your thoughts as respectfully as possible and the most important thing, justify your sayings. I rarely take part in conversations in this scene nowadays, and that's mostly because of the quality of the conversation and "cheap shots". Maybe I'm getting too old. And for SG, I also suggest to not make things harder what they really are. And with that I mean, if majority wants fe.; Big Tipper to be banned and no-one is against it, SG should have some balls to make quick LA decisions inside week or two. It's not that hard after all. We don't need 2 or 3 months long "testing ground" season to see if the shit is brown when we clearly know the answer already.37 points
-
36 points
-
36 points
-
Purification (elite) in: @Snus97_ Welcome to puri!๐ค๐35 points
-
Straikers looking for starting LD for potential future 6v6 tournaments in NHL 25. Contact me, Eki or FlyerKungen @ here or socials.35 points
-
34 points
-
GOONS ( elite ) looking STARTER RD + STARTER LD for upcoming ECL & tournaments! Send me msg if you are interest of these spots. Requirements: You are defenseman, not attacker. We need guy who can handle good defende skills and have motivation to doing that. I will check EVERY messages and need to guys who have huge motivation to step up and show the skills. PSN/DC/sportsgamergg: tkantola34 points
-
Ban truculence, big tipper, uf, no contest. Then we have the most competitive game we can have. Gameplay without traits aint it34 points
-
Free G for upcoming tounaments https://sportsgamer.gg/index.php/players/171134 points
-
Parasite in: @Vattuyy @tomboo- @uhNikke welcome๐ฅ34 points
-
33 points
-
33 points
-
Free RD for upcoming tournaments! Stats ๐ฎ Edit: Team Found33 points
-
Time to try one more time to compete at the highest level so Free LW/C/RW for upcoming FCL and ECL Spring Elite teams only๐ dm here or discord wpaananen33 points
-
After giving it some thought and reading others' takes on this... I'm also team BanThemAll. And here's the reasoning why: The whole X-Factor ability shenanigans were added to the game in order to highlight superstar players with their superstar abilities. I totally understand that concept from an offline mode or online versus point of view, it's a great addition and does what it's supposed to do: recognize greatness. But in WOC game modes, we don't need that at all - everybody can already spend their XP however they see fit under the ruleset of preset builds and be the superstar they want (even though I'd love to see the return of the old custom build system). In WOC the X-Factors don't make anyone a superstar in the way they were intended in the first place if evvvveryone on the ice has them. What the X-Factors bring in 6s especially is instead lower skill gap RNG to a vast variety of in-game scenarios an even stronger meta for each wingers, centers, defencedudes & goalies where everyone exploits weaknesses in the game Therefore a competitive setting with no superpower abilities would balance not only the meta but also the dreadful RNG. EA made the decision on our behalf to remove EE from WOC, which, if you think about it for a second, is actually is a huge step towards the direction I'm suggesting here. And absolutely nobody is complaining about it. Now it's all about finishing what EA started this year and play without the honestly quite unnecessary X-Factor abilities in 6s.33 points
-
Mby looking for some tryouts๐ค.. Free RW https://sportsgamer.gg/players/190133 points
-
Free G for next ECL Elite maybe pro๐ซฃ Ready to grind very much๐ซก Contact me here or psn kaz_zu33 points
-
Free G for FCL starter or backup contact psn or discord jubeex0r32 points
-
Free LW/C for Elite / Pro MartindalexC - Player profile - SportsGamer32 points
-
32 points
-
Free LW/C & LD for ECL. Division doesn't matter and I can be backup also. Contact me here or discord: ikarkkii31 points
-
Free C Rw rd for upcoming tournaments. contact me here psn playmeikkeri discord playmeikkeri31 points
-
Voittamaton need players for FCL (any pos), but especially at RD.31 points
-
Heimo In: @KingOfApes_ โฌ ๏ธ NOVA @Mozjayh โฌ ๏ธ EXEN Welcome to Heimo! Westend might feel a little different from Kivistรถ๐ Out from starting roster: @Sakkem @xHatsi31 points
-
Free D Pro/Elite https://sportsgamer.gg/players/60031 points
-
vNexs organization ๐ธ๐ช @iSvamp vNexs (IN) (Elite) pappeen- ๐ธ๐ช antoniomannen_ ๐ธ๐ช Skumboo ๐ณ๐ด Jonte05_ ๐ธ๐ช TTV_Anhberg ๐ธ๐ช LaxenHD ๐ธ๐ช PHDeemus ๐ธ๐ช vNexs Academy (IN) (Wildcard Pro) SeboLHD ๐ธ๐ช Jojjep- ๐ธ๐ช Mathiasgamer_07 ๐ณ๐ด xRoot89_ ๐ธ๐ช I-melle-I ๐ธ๐ช vNexs Wisemen (IN) (Core) Ma-x-imilian ๐ธ๐ช Malmenlid ๐ธ๐ช Juhi1891 ๐ธ๐ช Gurliver ๐ธ๐ช Samito97 ๐ซ๐ฎ Stenborg431 ๐ธ๐ช30 points
-
30 points
-
Free RW/LW for upcoming tournaments dc: hopeakypara9930 points