Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. hooneli

    hooneli

    Members


    • Points

      9

    • Posts

      19


  2. FlyerKungen

    FlyerKungen

    Members


    • Points

      6

    • Posts

      232


  3. tbnantti

    tbnantti

    Members


    • Points

      3

    • Posts

      116


  4. Xx_anddrej_xX

    Xx_anddrej_xX

    Members


    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      83


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/17/20 in Posts

  1. Hello fellow gamers, I made comeback recently to the 6vs6 scene and I've been having hard time accepting the current point system in our league. I think it's the worst point system you can have. I'm sure some of you must have been wondering the same. So let's say we have 2 games and both of those games go to overtime. For example both teams will win 1 of those games. They receive 3points per team. That's 6 points overall. If we compare that to some other team winning 2 games without OT and receiving 4 points there are 2 bonus points given. Where those 2 points magically appeared for the first pairing? They get rewarded going to OT and having a one bonus game win worth of points shared because of that and I think that's a lot. So I think either of these 2 options would be better than what we currently have: 1: Winner gets 2 points loser 0 (OT or not). 2: 3 points are shared each game (no magically appearing bonus points ever). 60min win = 3p, loss 0p. Overtime win = 2p, overtime loss 1p. I'm not sure if you already had a discussion about this because I've been away from the scene about 2-3 years. Let me know if so. What do you guys think about this, I want to hear your opinion. Am I overreacting and the current point system is fine for everyone or should there be re-evaluation of this?
    6 points
  2. For sure. I'm not sure tho if there's fair system for this "super skilled and super competitive" NHL game. There's pros and cons in every one of them. For me the ENCE EKI's first message in the old topic has still value. Win is win and the games are very short. Thats why I still support the current system. But anyhow, only Elite players and teams should be able to make decisions what happens in Elite. Because of license, prizepool, etc. Pro/Lite/Neo sure can do whatever they want imo, but you need separate polls then. Public poll inlcuding every skill level doesn't have so much value for me in this kind of case.
    5 points
  3. I calculated last season's regular season standings with the 3-2-1-0 system back when this was last discussed. 1. LHC 75 2. JYP 74 3. HAVU 74 4. hREDS 57 5. UB 51 6. Brayce 47 7. Roots 47 8. FBK 39 9. Vesa 38 10. KOVA 37 11. Ghetto 35 12. SJ 34 13. Checkmate 33 14. Luleå 30 15. Gotham 29 16. AF 20 If you compare the standings to the actual ECL10 standings, you can see that not a whole lot changed. The same 8 teams would have made the playoffs and the same teams would have occupied the relegation spots. The only anomaly in the standings is Checkmate, who actually finished 9th with 9 wins in OT out of their 13 wins. I'm sure you could replicate these results with the previous seasons as well, so it doesn't really make a difference.
    3 points
  4. But even in elite, teams and players come and go as the years go by. Do you want to vote for each season with new players? And for the topic, i agree with the original poster that current point system is worst of them all. Even still its not a big deal and difference is slim, as @tbnantti has calculated.
    2 points
  5. That's good to know, thank you for this! Current system is kinda good. It's same for everyone for sure but it could be used for matchfixing. For example last rounds of ECL regular season and none would be able to prove it. I agree everything you said. I think Elite teams should have their own vote for this (if there's a will). Maybe after this ECL. I just personally don't like seeing any bonus points shared. I think it's more fair to share same amount of points each game than this.
    2 points
  6. just buy the nhl21 ps4 was out of town for few month Looking for team I'm a Goalie can play few time a week Psn CROOKS-TC Keep save all!
    1 point
  7. The thing that i don't like in current system is that reward of win and loss is same than in losing two games, as long as you lose slow enough(60+ minutes). Current system is not unfair, but i just don't like that mentality. It rewards slowing the pace.
    1 point
  8. If you move away from hockey systems you can have a playoff system where there is an lower bracket and upper bracket. And I think that the current system is basically a remnant from systems where your season is a year long and can play only 1 game at a time
    1 point
  9. Thank you. I'll read this. My only problem with the current system is that it motivates you to go to OT. It's not the most fair system even if it's the same for everyone.
    1 point
  10. There's some old topic we had discussion about it earlier this year. Just FYI.
    1 point
  11. Free LW RW both hands but prefer RW Looking for team to play in ECL Division doesn't matter backup is ok too if i have playtime Have experiences from Pro Lite Neo and Gcl I m very active can play almost everiday For more Info contact me here or PSN Xx_anddrej_xX
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy