Jump to content

hooneli

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by hooneli

  1. Yeah I'm not against it at all. I just think regular season point system is good for regular season and bo X format is good for playoffs. I don't care what point system we use, I just want it to be the most fair possible. Current system is not. Edit: and why? Let's say we have a team that goes in OT for every game that they play. 30*3=90 points shared. Versus a team who don't go to OT at all, 30*2=60 points shared. Of course this is a stupid example but still a possibility. Points shared difference is 30. For example in 3-2-1-0 system the points shared difference would be 0.
  2. This is exactly what I'm trying to say here. The current system is fine by all means, but it's the worst of those 3 because it creates an unnecessary reward system for this game. I mean why are we using the worst system of all 3 if there are more fair systems to use? Edit: I think you can see this current system with at least 3 perspectives: Top Elite teams: I don't care, win is a win and it doesn't ''touch'' us. We will still be top team. Bottom Elite teams: This is good for us! If we get to OT as many times as possible and get a few wins we will be able to make playoffs! Others: These guys opinions will vary but I think they can look this point system kinda more ''all-around''. And don't take this personally, I think in both groups elite and bottom there are people who think ''all-around'' too, this is just an exaggeration for this example.
  3. True true. I'm not suggesting it by any means but thinking current system makes it just a bit more viable.
  4. That's good to know, thank you for this! Current system is kinda good. It's same for everyone for sure but it could be used for matchfixing. For example last rounds of ECL regular season and none would be able to prove it. I agree everything you said. I think Elite teams should have their own vote for this (if there's a will). Maybe after this ECL. I just personally don't like seeing any bonus points shared. I think it's more fair to share same amount of points each game than this.
  5. Thank you. I'll read this. My only problem with the current system is that it motivates you to go to OT. It's not the most fair system even if it's the same for everyone.
  6. Hello fellow gamers, I made comeback recently to the 6vs6 scene and I've been having hard time accepting the current point system in our league. I think it's the worst point system you can have. I'm sure some of you must have been wondering the same. So let's say we have 2 games and both of those games go to overtime. For example both teams will win 1 of those games. They receive 3points per team. That's 6 points overall. If we compare that to some other team winning 2 games without OT and receiving 4 points there are 2 bonus points given. Where those 2 points magically appeared for the first pairing? They get rewarded going to OT and having a one bonus game win worth of points shared because of that and I think that's a lot. So I think either of these 2 options would be better than what we currently have: 1: Winner gets 2 points loser 0 (OT or not). 2: 3 points are shared each game (no magically appearing bonus points ever). 60min win = 3p, loss 0p. Overtime win = 2p, overtime loss 1p. I'm not sure if you already had a discussion about this because I've been away from the scene about 2-3 years. Let me know if so. What do you guys think about this, I want to hear your opinion. Am I overreacting and the current point system is fine for everyone or should there be re-evaluation of this?
  7. NHL21 is around the corner and I've been thinking about playing 6vs6 again (last time was ECL5 I guess). I prefer playing RW but I can try LW too if that's what your team needs. Been always ECL Elite player so I prefer playing in Elite team. If that's not available for me then I'm also open to Pro teams. I would describe my playstyle as a 2-way playmaking winger. Hit me up here in PM or Twitter. PSN: hooneli Twitter: @hooneliNHL
  8. Let's say I wanna build a championship team and can't name myself: LW: Mikaasi, MukiMaisteri, Patzlaf C: Dominointi, cHIIMEERa, Gendlik RW: FlyerKungen, Foppa, Jumalpeku LD: Janzuh, Haldeem, Selarit RD: Esajorma, Veskuline, Vatalisti G: Hansulinho, W1ldrus There are so many great players who couldn't make this list and I think many of them are better players individual skill/pointwise but I believe best players are those who have experience and great 2-way skills in this game.
  9. Well usually good players play in great teams and that's how you usually get to know those guys. + You said where I've been all these year(s) so that gives me a picture that he has been playing on top & elite level many years. So it matters a lot from ''knowing'' point of view. Greatest LW in tournament because he is point leader? Is that the argument? I don't agree with you if that's the case. Being greatest requires much more than scoring points in my opinion. Your argument for vatalisti is '' he is amazing D ''? I think both are great players and should have more recognition but you didn't bring much into this debate.
  10. Nhl 15 didn't have eashl on ps4 and we didn't play on ps3 anymore. I agree and believe you that those overalls are probably inaccurate and that overall thing is pretty much made for fun and it's not based on a real stats. More like a directive fun thing to have. ''Just 90 overall''? Is that really a bad overall to have? Could you enlighten me which top team did Joukki play before nhl 15 and how would you rate him and why? Also you could tell me something about vatalisti since you seem to know him. Thanks already! ps. Its game day!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy