Yoloberg Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 17 hours ago, tbnantti said: I would like to go back to the topic of eating ass. What’s your take broskis Let us first address the more delicate subject: the art — or ordeal — of posterior gastronomy. To indulge in such an act requires, above all, trust — the same rare and precious commodity now absent from Sportsgamer’s financial ecosystem. For just as one must have unwavering confidence in one’s partner’s hygiene before embarking on such an expedition, so too must the community trust that its hard-earned funds are being handled with respect, precision, and care. You see, there’s a curious parallel here. The bold explorer of the human derrière and the faithful Sportsgamer participant are united by a shared vulnerability. In both cases, one places something intimate — one’s body, or one’s money — into another’s hands, hoping for reward rather than regret. Yet, alas, in Sportsgamer’s case, what began as a passionate experience of communal joy has, of late, left a rather unpleasant aftertaste. In more genteel terms: eating ass, when executed with mutual consent, cleanliness, and enthusiasm, can be a transcendent exercise in trust and connection. But when rushed, mismanaged, or performed without due diligence, it becomes an act of betrayal — much like promising guaranteed prize pools and then discovering that the cupboard (or indeed, the wallet) is bare. Sportsgamer, in its prime, was the immaculate partner: polished, prepared, and proud of its presentation. But now, as it stands in the cold light of debt and delay, it resembles the partner who swore they “showered earlier,” leaving the community to wonder if perhaps, in hindsight, a bit more transparency would have been appreciated before diving in headfirst. 1 1 Quote
localhefe Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago hi @SportsGamer i got multiple posts removed from this thread for a couple of jokes & one of them contained a swear word (my bad, really really sorry). i've learned from my mistakes. as we all know, you tend to ban people based on face value and how good buddies u are to them. but this one time, when your integrity is being questioned, could you make an exception and remove all unnecessary/troll posts that don't add value to chat, even if they are from your buddies? i'll be waiting for your reply. br, paikallinen samu 5 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.