-
Posts
127 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
tbnantti last won the day on October 2
tbnantti had the most liked content!
Gaming Information
-
Xbox Live Gamertag
tbnantti
-
PSN ID
tbnantti
Recent Profile Visitors
3107 profile views
tbnantti's Achievements
-
I would like to go back to the topic of eating ass. What’s your take broskis
-
Hey hey hey no need to cook me i just wanted to talk about things i’m passionate about
-
I didn’t read this thoroughly but something about eating ass? I’m partial. 🤝
-
Wheels I think should be an easy ban since it’ll be used by ~everyone if it’s not, and used by no one if it is banned so either way it’s the same outcome but banning it provides more versatility to the builds. Truculence is way too powerful and I would prefer seeing it banned. It slows the game down and hitting works well enough without it. Unstoppable force is a broken mechanic with the ability and should be banned. If not, it will be ran by a bunch of teams. Those are the three abilities I would like to see banned at least. The others I’m fine with (at least for now).
- 501 replies
-
- 10
-
-
EU Clubs looking for players - PlayStation 5 & Xbox Series X|S
tbnantti replied to Robsom's topic in EASHL Teams
Setelikerho looking for starting C for the upcoming ECL Pro season. Msg us on PSN/Discord/here.- 4916 replies
-
- 16
-
-
-
-
- freeagents
- clubs
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
The decision as a whole is ”fine” for me, but I do agree with the points Pena made about the arguments not really working. In any democratic process only the people who actually vote are taken into consideration. Everyone has the chance to, and if you don’t, you obviously don’t care about the matter or the outcome enough to cast your vote. That means the people who don’t vote are fine with any decision. Like I said, the decision is fine, but you could have just said this is what we wanted to do and own it instead of this irrational argument about not possibly reaching everyone.
-
EU Clubs looking for players - PlayStation 5 & Xbox Series X|S
tbnantti replied to Robsom's topic in EASHL Teams
Respect the blueline looking for G for FCL- 4916 replies
-
- 17
-
-
-
- freeagents
- clubs
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I don’t know how many polls we need to arrange to come to the conclusion that the majority (of the top two leagues at least) are in favor of keeping things as they are with only Big Tipper being banned. Or are we voting until we come to a conclusion that satisfies SG by banning them all? That’s what it feels like. I’m in favor of keeping things untouched from the previous ECL, for reasons mentioned in my previous post. The gameplay is more open with X-Factors.
-
I have played the game since the first iteration of EASHL in NHL 09, and I can honestly say the EASHL side of things, gameplay wise, is the best it has been in a long time. I would even go as far as saying it's the best it has been in the PS4/PS5 era. We have finally moved away from the god awful pakota vaan (force) meta, and can score from plays farther out from the net. When someone scores a golden one-tee goal against us, I feel like we have made a mistake in our coverage, as opposed to a forced pass getting through in front of the net, which can go through even if it's "covered". I think teams should be punished for breakdowns in coverage and the game feels rewarding both offensively and defensively that way. Obviously I have dropped down divisions this year, moved to the wing and use golden 1T, so my opinion might be a bit biased, but I've played with and against Elite teams enough in this version as well to confidently say the meta is way better than it used to be. I am 100% in favor of leaving things as they are with only Big Tipper being banned. I fear an XF ban would move the meta back towards forcing, net scrambles and broken plays in front of the net, which is both boring to play and boring to watch. Even with sniper builds on wings. EDIT: Another thing to note is having to cover the 1T/CQ makes the defence more active and opens up space in other areas of the ice, as teams can't just collapse to the slot and play passively on defence.
- 501 replies
-
- 25
-
-
-
If Leksand deserves the spot in Elite, they'll win the qualifiers, surely.
- 15 comments
-
- 19
-
-
After banning CQ, something must be done about goalie abilities. Sure, you can say you can run a sniper build or dump points in shots, but the fact is you NEED those points for speed and acceleration because that's what the meta is. You need chances first to even attempt to score goals. The same logic could be applied to goalies if their abilities were banned: if you want to save snipes, put points in glove/blocker high. They don't have to make such a decision now. Goalies are already terribly OP on straight snipes from the slot. I don't necessarily think the difference will be as major as people are making it out to be, but if we're going to start banning abilities we should do it the right way.
-
I don't really care what happens, but do not, under any circumstances, ban elite edges.
- 21 replies
-
- 11
-
-
-
First of all, there are 16 teams in Elite, not 8. And yes, like I said in my message I do think it's fine because it's the only way to ensure the integrity of the competition. That, or expand the divisions. If we go down that road of logic, it's "unfair" that Lite has a prize pool at all considering we're talking about the 49th best team in Europe with the Lite winner. In what other esport is that possible? Elite has to remain the crown jewel that teams aspire to reach.