Player licences are appropriate as is. It is an equal and a good way to pay expenses for LA. If there was transparency on cost structures etc, even a bit higher player license fees would be tolerable. I am sure most of us agree that there are expenses that need to be covered.
But for lower divisions especially, the team fees compared to prize pools on those divisions look really out of place. Its not a good look, recreational players paying for "division entry fees", that go for the most part on other expenses than their divisions prizes.
ECL '23 brings 1v1, bigger prizes and World Finals to the table - are you ready to ramp things up to the next level?
in ECL
Posted
Player licences are appropriate as is. It is an equal and a good way to pay expenses for LA. If there was transparency on cost structures etc, even a bit higher player license fees would be tolerable. I am sure most of us agree that there are expenses that need to be covered.
But for lower divisions especially, the team fees compared to prize pools on those divisions look really out of place. Its not a good look, recreational players paying for "division entry fees", that go for the most part on other expenses than their divisions prizes.
Thats my two cents.