Leaderboard

Nightmare (Supernatural) Is looking for LD and G for upcoming ECL etc. We are very active throughout the year. What we are looking for: You are able to play 3-5 nights a week 18-00cest(2-3hours per day) (not so important with G) You are looking for a team in which you will play every ECL game. (LD) We are a Finnish team and pref Finnish players. Contact me here or by psn: Kozeehh

Speedy Bros Hockey(Pro) looking players for every position! SBH have now four great seasons behind in Pro-division, but now its rebuild-time and time to take next step! So contact me here for more info etc. see ya!

No offense, but the fact is that Elite wouldn't be elite if there would be like 24 or 32 teams. Same thing with Pro. Right now the most of our teams in this scene are Pro/Lite teams, not Elite so it would make zero sense to grow Elite only because there's more lower level teams these days. And if someone bases their opinion on a day dream where every lower level team would magically be Elite/High pro - then you can keep on day dreaming. And this is not me being a dick, just saying how it is as someone needs to say it out loud (with KingofApes). Haven't changed anything? Um, the value of first three divisions would obviously grow and the match schedule would be partly the same for the top three divisions. Elite 16, Pro 32, Lite 32, The Rest XX (the hungry, the ugly and the dads). This system would be as competitive as it ever could be for top80 teams which is about the same amount of teams NHLGamer had in it's first division season (ECL4). How's that no progress? I get that some people would like to have every possible team in the higher level but at that point the whole reason of having divisions would pretty much disappear.

I'm glad to see that there is so many future Elite teams coming to Lite next season! It will be interesting to watch how many of those will dig their way out after ~8 playoff rounds 😂 I think the best option could be: Elite: 16 Pro: 32 Semi: 32 (Lite top 20, relegated teams from Pro and Elite teams) Lite: 50+

Still free

Free winger or ld/rd for next ecl. Trying to play simple and effective. Looking high lite or pro team. Can play almost every day. I'm open for tryouts For more info contact me with psn chat or here Psnid: kkostiiii Previously known as S0HVAPERUNA___

My opinions: ECL Elite: 16 teams ECL Pro: 16 teams ECL ''Semi Pro'': 32 teams or more ECL Lite: Rest 3 ECL tournaments per NHL If 4 divisions system happens in future, I want to see only 16 teams in Pro. That would of course give much more tight matchups than it does now and it could develop those teams more who gets promoted to Elite.

There was some talk of this topic at the end of last year. I and many others think that there is too many teams in ECL for just 3 divisions. Huge number of Lite teams causes too short regular season and too long play-offs. And not to forget huge cap on skill level as well. I personally think that NHL Gamer should not waste any more time on this decision. It should be made before ECL9. Time is short. Please be fast to share your opinion on this case and also remember to vote. I think there should be 4 divisions ECL ELITE (16 teams) ECL PRO (32 teams) ECL SEMI PRO (32 teams) ECL LITE (rest of the teams)

Can we add one division above elite for Team seppo and team plee to even the elite division 🤷🏻‍♂️

And it looks like you missed my point that a new team should absolutely always start from the lowest level. It's not encouraging that you don't have to start from the bottom with a new team? If there is division that you can just skip with your new team because you've played in a good team in the past? Does all new teams start from this new division or just some? If not all, how do you differentiate who gets to start from where? Face value? Looking forward a bit, if that new division has a team limit, such as 32 or whatever was suggested, someday that's going to become full like Pro is now. So do we then start to drop teams already there to Lite or don't let Lite champions promote, when by that same criteria (again; face value ?) one of these allegedly new better teams gets formed again and they should get to skip Lite and go straight to this new division? Or do we then just make 5th division to circumvent this exact same "problem" again? Or do we close our eyes and ears and believe hard enough that when number of teams and players rise, number good players doesn't and this will not be problem again in the future? I think that new teams should start from bottom of division table, and if they are good enough, they will get promoted. If they don't, then they clearly ain't good enough or as good as they think. Almost all teams got into playoffs last season in Lite, and i don't believe you can win or lose whole best-of-7 playoff series entirely by luck. 3 divisions and if there is 3rd ECL season in a future, it's possible to make it into Elite in the same NHL game's lifespan.

I think it's better to divide lite in multiple groups rather than make more divisions, unless we'll found some absolutely fool proof way of deciding into which division each new team should go to. I think not getting from lite to elite fast enough is a valid argument. Not saying it should be fast and easy, but it should be difficult only for the right reasons. Having to be good enough and practicing, for example. It shouldn't feel difficult just because it's slow. @iSvamp used Vesa Pompa as an example: they were placed into lite despite being way too much of an overkill for that division, just like Oton Letkutemppu. It is frustrating as fuck having to play against teams that don't stand a chance against you, unless they get extremely lucky. There is nothing competitive, developing or exciting going into the games knowing it's one of those nights you just have to get over with and there's nothing for you to win, just to lose. It's something you see in pro as well, now imagine going through three divisions like that before getting to elite. And if you fail in just one playoff series, as teams underperform and get seeded lower than they should, you'll repeat that same division all over again.

Bellizzi (Pro) are looking for a two Defender(LD/RD) and one forward contact here

Why is that a problem? If your statement is true (I'm not so sure about that), the top lite teams and the top pro level teams would end up in the same division for the next tournament. Sounds pretty good to me. As one of the original Divisions creators, assuming the main goal is to shrink Lite in size, I have a different suggestion: Increase ECL Pro to 48 teams and keep the existing structure.

Free G looking for new Challenge for Nhl20 and future Tournaments! Pro Teams prefered because i played the last 5 Seasons in Pro Division. My second Account:mhcforever Feel free to contact me for tryouts here or on Psn! Greetz Devil

An additional division is absolutely needed and would be better for everyone. Also ECL 3x in a year would be the best imo, you could grind from Semi-Pro to Elite in one NHL title if you've got the skill.. A shorter offseason would probably result in steadier rosters too

Wow, never thought so many of us would prefer four over the current three. With 4 the Lite would literally be lite and as there's some teams around who dont even want to compete in the highest level, SEMI-PRO/LITE option would be a lot better for them. Also it would upgrade the status of the Pro division. @ahonaattori good shit.

Hola! Looking for Team, I´m 33 years young Finnish dude. I play LD or RD - left or right handed https://nhlgamer.com/player.php?playerID=1124 Contact here private message

After 8 wonderful months in Almost Famous it’s time for me to move on to new challenges and find new home. I’m 19 years old finnish guy but can speak english also if needed✌️ My position has always been RW but I think I can play C as well😇 I can play almost daily and I’m highly motivated to get better every day💪 Feel free to contact me here or psn: sokkelo__

Free Agent G / NHL20 Sometimes lose, always win.