Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. Nampa77

    Nampa77

    Members


    • Points

      9

    • Posts

      40


  2. Snapuster

    Snapuster

    Members


    • Points

      4

    • Posts

      128


  3. cyberg

    cyberg

    Members


    • Points

      4

    • Posts

      40


  4. Ikavalko

    Ikavalko

    Members


    • Points

      3

    • Posts

      36


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/10/18 in all areas

  1. Free lw/c Former teams: Written in the stars, Sika, Dynasty, Sjukstugan, Almost Famous, Team Frosty
    9 points
  2. eSM Qualifiers Playoffs Round 2: Dynasty - Rusty Blades ECL ELITE Groupstage | Dynasty - Butterfly Effect ECL ELITE Groupstage | Dynasty - Falun Coal Miners ECL ELITE Groupstage | Dynasty - FILADELPHIA ECL ELITE Groupstage | Dynasty - Northern Stars ECL ELITE Groupstage | Dynasty - Team Frosty ECL ELITE Groupstage | Dynasty - SIKA
    4 points
  3. Almost Famous In Rimpe37 from Gotham Knights WELCOME BACK 🤩 Out Sadapoika to Unlucky Boys HC
    3 points
  4. Ok, one question: Where in 13.3 is the part saying a transfer of a player is only legal when his old team has invited enough players to comply with the minimum roster size again? There´s no such condition in the wording of 13.3. It reads “If a player is released or transferred…” which refers to a completed event (the transfer) in the past. So, we need to take the timeline of events into account. The transfer is done (in this case with the exception of 13.4), from that point on, if you take the wording of 13.3 seriously, the player is part of the new team. Period. No conditions apply, not an OK from the league or anything else is necessary. Now the result of the second sentence of 13.3 is: the releasing team is asked to invite enough players to comply with the rules again (13.3 second sentence and 2.2). But how would that bother the previously released player? From the moment his transfer is done he´s part of his new team and cannot be hold responsible for the actions (failing to comply with 2.2) of his old team - even if he was an A on the old team. By agreeing with the transfer (13.4) the C kind of relinquishes the A´s of their duty to their old team, otherwise the consent requirement doesn’t make any sense. Plus, if I remember correct, right before the two A´s left, RAD had still 9 players on the roster. The evening the A´s left, also one of their Goalies left. So, the LA is in my opinion forced to give a concrete timeline, who left at which time, to make a substantiated decision. Let´s say the two A´s left right before the G did. Then the G is the one who puts them under the 2.2 limits. Can that bother already completed transfers afterwards? In that case the material scope of 13.3 is not touched. In fact, by the wording of the rules right now at least one transfer of the A´s was completely fine. There was no infraction with 13.3. Regarding your problems with the timing of the LA decision. Well, it´s the wording of the last part of the second sentence of 13.3 (“… otherwise it will be disqualified.”) implementing a disqualification requires an official act from LA. If they wanted an automatic disqualification for a violation with 2.2 the wording should be more like this: “… is disqualified without further ado/notice.”
    1 point
  5. In this situation, is it possible that KingOfApes_ could have released everybody from Radical except himself within a 24 hour period and been the only one to face punishment?
    1 point
  6. Unlucky Boys HC in: Sadapoika from Almost Famous
    1 point
  7. First, I agree that the rulebook is not perfect - in fact, I disagree with many parts of it, an arbitrary roster size rule being one of them. Secondly I am like-minded in thinking it should be applied to the word. Before I go further I would like to just point out that I am not nor have I ever been part of the LA and I have not discussed the case with any members thereof. That being said, I do disagree with your interpretation in this particular case. According to the sections of the rulebook you quoted, I agree it was possible for the assistant captains to move to another team, however only after having secured enough new players to the team within 24 hours, in order to comply with section 13.3 (in bold in quote). Had they managed to do that I do not see an obstacle for the transfer. Furthermore, I do not see how the timing of LA's final decision matters, when the rules clearly state in which cases a team is disqualified and that assistant captains of a disqualified team are not allowed to transfer. Once the roster had been under 8 players for over 24 hours I find very little room for interpretation.
    1 point
  8. when you create a new team just think these things: 1. Is he a good guy? 2. Is he a good player? 3. Number 1 question again. my only advice
    1 point
  9. Would be nice if players that actually forced our team to quit would get some kind of punishment as its almost impossible to get Elite level players during the season but no... players should show some respect and dedication to their teams and not leave the team if you lose a game or two smh
    1 point
  10. Good mind, and a decent sauna evening.
    1 point
  11. Drew a new logo for the team "Free from Rodents"
    1 point
  12. 1 point
  13. New work. 30€ Thanks guys.
    1 point
  14. Free Forward mostly! Cant play ECL tho but I hope I could find team where I could play EASHL time to time. Ex teams: Victorious Secret HC 💸,X Factor 🏆, Written In The Stars ❤️, Carlsberg HC ❤️🏆, Radical 🙄. PSN: KingOfApes_
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy