Jump to content

Frilander

Members
  • Posts

    77
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Frilander

  1. On 16.10.2021 at 19.19, Tappu kirjoitti:

    Those are annoying goals to let for sure and they happen to every goalie who is playing this game at the moment😴

    The game was released just this week so there will eventually be patches that fix these issues like every year :D 

    giving up after such a short time of playing the game seems bit too much in my opinion, as overall this looks to be one of the best NHL games in a long time💪😎

    How did the patch go. Any fixings? 

    • Like 2
    • Love it! 2
  2. On 6.5.2020 at 19.05, K__0__S__E kirjoitti:

    Oho i looks like i deleted one chapter there :DDD

    It doesnt make anyone better. But i believe that in the near future we will have more cup candidates that 2 or 3 and Elite will be tighter on what it comes to top8. And then the meaning of spot on regular season would not be so huge. 

    But how the 3p system would make more cup candidates? I mean tell me some example from this elite season?

  3. On 27.4.2018 at 02.27, Kenu kirjoitti:

     

    1. Would you join a buy-in league?
    2. How much would you be ready to pay for being part of a buy-in league?
    3. Would you expect to win this league and regain the money or the full prize?
    4. What sort of sum would be acceptable as the prize in the first season of the buy-in league?
    5. How would you expect the prize pool to be split between the teams in the league?
    6. How long of a season would you expect in a buy-in league?
    7. How often would you participate in a buy-in league?
    8. If the league was separate from the ECL, would you then prioritize it over the ECL?
    9. Do you think ECL should be a buy-in league?
    10. Do you think certain divisions should be buy-in, such as ECL Elite?
    11. Hypothetically, say ECL Elite and Pro had buy-ins - what would stop an Elite caliber team for signing up for Pro in order to get "an easy" tournament win and prize money?
    12. If you are against buy-ins or on the fence about the topic - what would be a small enough amount for you to join and still be able to have fun?

    1. Yes

    2. 30€

    3. Nope but I can pay little bit for more fun. Playing for money would be extremely intense and fun.

    4. 1000-1600? tbh I have no idea.

    5. ^^

    6. 2-3months

    7. Everytime its possible.

    8. Well it would be about money so yes.. But ofc I will be playing for ECL all the time.

    9. I think there should be atleast one buy-in division.

    10. Whatever could work..

    11. Maybe 1x buy-in division could be the best then

    • Thanks 1
  4. 1 tunti sitten, gzell60 kirjoitti:

    Alright, now I think I get your point. So you're saying if we decide to start a divisional buy-in tournament, the bottom tier division needs to be free to play so we can still attract new teams that will be dragged into paying money when they are good enough to be promoted.

    Nah at very start I said ppl will get interested about buy-in tournaments and that will give us new players and new teams. Dont make up that stuff lol :D If there is many players that doesnt want to buy-in then you could make divisions for them where they dont need to pay..

    But I 100% believe money tournaments will attract more players than free to play tournaments. Its my opinion and I dont think I have any facts to prove my opinion but I guess you neither.

    • Like 1
  5. 46 minuuttia sitten, gzell60 kirjoitti:

    I have mixed feelings about it, and I'm also not sure how that helps answering the questions I brought up in your quote 🙁

    Your questions literally have nothing to do with what I meant... And in my quote there definitely was answers for ur questions.

    "Should there also be a division without payments? Yes. That brings more new players and teams to compete together which is never a bad thing."

    "Lower tier teams/Less known teams" can practice for buy-in tournament in division that has no payment. What would be difference if there is buy-in divisions + free for all divisions? 

  6. 47 minuuttia sitten, gzell60 kirjoitti:

    I'd argue that if you grab a snapshot of tonight's 6 vs. 6 ingame top 100 leaderboard, and list all the European teams in there, most are already on NHLGamer. Does a buy in tournament really attract the lower-tier, less known teams that most likely have no chance to make up for their buy in fee? Would love to dig a little deeper there.

    Do we agree on the fact that a league with external prizes and no buy in fee would have a higher chance of attracting these teams though?

    This is written by @jouni29 above

    "Personally I'd prefer a laddered type of payment system based on the playing level, meaning that Elite could have somewhere around 100€ buy-in for team, Pro 40€ and Lite 15€. With those amounts it would be Elite 1600€, Pro 1200€ and Lite 900€ based on ECL 6's team amount in each division. This could be split something like 60% for winner, 30% for second place and 10% to NHLGamer. That way we would have prizes to play for, and some money to improve this community and for keeping things going on.
    Should there also be a division without payments? Yes. That brings more new players and teams to compete together which is never a bad thing."

    How you see this?

  7. 50 minuuttia sitten, gzell60 kirjoitti:

    How?

    Because ppl would get more interested of it. Gamers and even regular human who loves NHL videogame series + real life hockey. You can take my words up and laugh at me if it aint working.  I might be wrong but this is what I think.

    • Like 3
  8. Been waiting for this couple of years and some ppl thought im crazy. Thanks!

    Ridicilous to think that buy- in prices would get some teams disappeared because they dont want to buy-in. Imagine how many new players+teams it will give to us? 

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy