Jump to content

imosi

Members
  • Posts

    143
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

News Record Comments posted by imosi

  1. 3 tuntia sitten, Jnmxxx kirjoitti:

    Yeah 20€-100€ isnt that big of a deal to pay. However, when you know what you get in return for that money its getting pretty funny. For lower divisions the return is basically just a platform where to schedule games and nothing else.

    Its more of an principle not to pay this kind of fee’s.

    You know many people comment that just dont go out for one night or just dont buy that case of beer or something but i can feed my two kids for a week with 45€ to give some perspective.

    Also the timing for these increased fees could have been better.  First of all everyone had to buy PS5's, then of course the game and now the increased team licenses plus the player licenses. That's a lot of money.

    I really understand the frustration of the lower divisions especially compared to the price pool. This also affects us who play Pro. Now "only" the top 8 get something back.

    For most I don't think it's about that players can't afford to pay the fees, but it's a matter of principles.

    Maybe sportsgamer could consider to be more open to the comminity about where the money will be used for? We all do understand there are expenses, but the lack of information causes the amount of negativity atm..

    image.jpeg.7c55eeee1990c134754b2887cae6bfd0.jpeg

    "Se oli tonnin seteli"..

    Tonni

    • Like 25
  2. 29 minuuttia sitten, iSvamp kirjoitti:

    Nope! from now. You can can still change it. Do the right thing from the start if you already can see that this is wrong and that it will be changed in the future. 

    Yes I did. You could just have said "this is wrong, I want to play about it". You didn't, same as your team. 

    First of all the team is not mine and im not the captain of the team just a member. Please tell me what would my comments change at this point?  These are all my personal opinions. What do you want me to say that you would be happy? Can I say it more clearly, I think no one deserves a free spot.  

    • Like 1
  3. 1 minuutti sitten, FINSeRe kirjoitti:

    How about ECL 9 and Delusion (now hREDS)? 

    That season they were über dominant in the Pro, imagine putting that kind of team in Lite.. Would Lite teams enjoy playing against that kind of team and losing 20-0? They were winning in Pro by over 10 goals many occasions (like 17-5 and 13-1).

    If hREDS formed today would you seriously put them to Lite?

    Exactly, this is the hard part of this whole "how to change" the qualifier system that works for everyone.   Ofc everyone understands that a "super" team like that doesn't belong to play in lite. These kind of teams (Elite level) aren't established too often.  But if we want to make a change, we need to do it at some point. 

  4. 2 tuntia sitten, Kenu kirjoitti:

    How would you personally formulate the team ownership rule? 

     

    My point was by no means to have any kind of disrespect for the new teams, I know they are very good and for sure could have success in PRO, but feels a bit unfair for all the teams who are fighting their ways from the lower divisions. Was more of a friendly advice. Look at teams like Ghetto Firebirds etc. Of course sometimes changes in the lineup is necessary.

    But when you change the name and the whole roster its a bit weird.  I dont know about how the rule would go, but maybe the staff would have to take a look at the teams who are changing basically everything.  Maybe a Captain + some old members at least. minimum. Would it be too harsh for a new team to start from Lite for an example? All ideas are welcome! I advice everyone to give their ideas for making these tournaments better for everyone. 

    • Love it! 1
  5. 5 minuuttia sitten, iSvamp kirjoitti:

    It's just that your team doesn't deserve a spot in PRO without qualification (but I really understand why you and imosi are fighting about it, cuz you got it for free) compared with SSK who almost reached the playoffs in PRO and NOW needs to battle for their spot. 

    It makes no fucking sense that a team in LITE who needed 10 more wins to even win the LITE division getting a spot for free in a higher division when a team who almost reached the playoffs in the higher division needs to fight for the spot in a qualification to even stay there. 

    It's fucked up for real. 

    I would love to see you guys fight about this PRO spot vs Royal HT and their "Elite" roster. 

    But once again, congratz. :)

     

    Did you read my comment at all? I am personally against free spots. I dont think any of the "free spot" teams are specially proud of getting promoted this way.  We didnt make the rules, so I think your comments "blaming" us for getting a promotion is a bit strange..

    • Like 6
  6. 3 tuntia sitten, MaciPapi kirjoitti:

    B. If 25 team Qualifier is to big and take too long time. Let the highest Pro seeded teams from the Qualifiers get those open Pro spots and replace them in the Qualifiers with the 5 Lite teams. This would feel more fair and you'd have time until next ECL to overhaul these Qualifer rules and it's flow.

    I am sorry, but what is the logic here?  

    Personally ive played in lite, pro and elite. I dont see much of a skill difference between top 8 lite and most of the pro teams (maybe not top 4-8). At least before. Maybe its different now and I am completely wrong, who knows..
    I see that the biggest skill difference is pro -> elite. 

    Anyway.. How are these ideas fair for the ”old” teams, who played very long seasons just to play in the same qualify with a team that is maybe 1-4 weeks old (Wildcard)? Why would any team "deserve" a free spot?

    On a personal level I also see it a bit odd, that the captain is enough to ”own” the team and its enough to keep the team spot. Just kick the whole team and get new players in after a ”bad” season? I dont think that is the key for a good success in a long run. 
     

    Overall I find the new system is a good idea and its main idea, which is getting rid of these free spots.
     

    Unfortunately this isnt anything new and this has happened before every new ecl season.  This is why need these new ideas and systems. 

    However at the moment the ”new system” is maybe a bit too confusing and hard to understand.

    Or maybe im just dumb😬..

     

    • Like 1
  7. I think it would be fair for all the remaining teams to extend the time with one day and make Thursday a game day.

    The pairs came out on Thursday 21 cet and the schedule wasn't even ready? It was clearly impossible to schedule game that day.

    So now you make us play the series in only 6 days and 2 of these days are weekend days. So that makes it only 4 days, because nobody plays ecl on Friday and Saturday, even Sunday is a bad day for ECL.

    • Like 4
  8. 3 tuntia sitten, Taunomaister1 kirjoitti:

    good points but we are playing NHL19 and the old tuner is 99% like NHL18 and that why i dont like it. i really hope they keep this new tuner so we can play "new game" and not always the same EA bullshit changing the game to old settings. 

    - Its samething every year. WUHUU new game.. and after 2months we are playing the same game than last year. so if u dont know how to play NHL19 go back to NHL18 :D :D and remember little humor ;) :D

    What should I do, I sucked in NHL 18 too😂.. ?

    • Thanks 1
  9. This tuner is Shite! EA should bring us the old tuner back right away, if you can't even bring the "real" v.1.0 tuner back or you still haven't found a fix for the dressing room error.
    I wonder if the Americans have this error, I highly doubt it. The good news is, only 4 days left on this test period. 

    Dear, Mr. Ramjagsingh, Kenu and illuminati🔺, ja ketä muita näitä nyt oli,

    I know you are reading nhlgamer.com🌚.

    Please, before you bring any new hybrid tuners or updates to this wonderful game of yours, FIX the **** Dressing room error!

    Anyway, about this new so called "beta tuner". First of all this is NOT the one we had in beta. Also the skating was changed in an update, not a tuner.
     really wonder, why did you **** this up as well?

    My personal thoughts about the BETA tuner:

    -It's way too easy to defend now, even our ripuli (💩) team can now somehow defend against much better teams (elite). Something is definitely wrong 😅.

    -Stick checking is a joke, you can lift the stick even from behind and it's ridiculously effective.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but man it's hard to protect the puck more than couple of seconds now. But I bet our young superstars agree on this one. (Or maybe it's just me and I suck *ss).

    -Poke checking might be more realistic..But I think tha it's unbalanced compared to stick lifting. It is really hard to use poke check without getting a tripping penalty

    -Skating, is it me or why does skating still feel so bad or why does it feel so sluggish? How hard can it be to make it slightly smoother or faster?

    -Now this game feels like 50% Ice hockey and 50% fencing.

    The last tuner was much better in my opinion, even though the skating feels super sluggish in that one as well.  It was close to being perfect", would just ned a couple of minor tweaks.

    Thänks!

    Sincerely yours,

    Säm

    • Like 9
    • Thanks 1
  10. On 28.5.2018 at 13.17, vatalisti kirjoitti:

    Zande 6 shutouts from 13 playoff games, not on the top lineup 🤣

    Anyways thanks on the season everyone! 

    Because he's Turkulainen 😗

    • Like 2
    • Sad 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy