-
Posts
17 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Forums
Events
News
News in Russian
GCL News
SCL News
CSCL
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Blogs
Profiles
Store
Gallery
News Record Comments posted by LastMandalorian
-
-
30 minutes ago, MartindalexC said:
True, but in the example you're describing the rule wouldn't apply as the goalie is clearly making an attempt to save the puck. I'd posit that the rule in question is especially clear in that it specifically makes mention of rule 9.1 (Fair play). Sure, there's something to be said that someone could interfere with a player by making it seem as though they're playing 'normally' but how else would you describe the rule? Since we have to let goalies exit their crease from time to time so we cannot be too restrictive in the wording of it.
Awesome! Just making sure I wont get a life time ban or anything.
-
1 minute ago, Kenu said:
The intention is very important here. In the cases which we have handled so far, the intent has clearly been to interfere with the player rather than play the puck.
I agree. But the rule is very broadly worded. The specific situation on the video is a quite clear exploitation of the game. But a fight for the puck infront of the net shouldnt count like one. Sliding across the goal to desperately keep the puck out of the net is not exploitation of the game in my opinion - even if it includes players going down. But it could still be included as an infraction as the rule is worded right now.
-
2 minutes ago, Kenu said:
Is he going for the puck or to interfere with the player?
Either. Both. Whichever he can reach in time.
-
What about a goalie aggresively sliding towards a player going for a rebound outside of the crease, but infront of the goal?
-
-
1 hour ago, MartindalexC said:
LUL x 2
No surprise MartindalexC is getting a kick out of this
- 1
-
Giving out WOs in Elite Semi-finals is a true tragedy for the league. Much shame to both teams that they could not reach an agreement to play all games in time, and forced LA:s hand. Giving extra time has been a focus of much criticism in earlier tournaments - and it seems popular demand made it self heard in the end. I hope every team takes note from this and recruit bigger rosters for coming seasons, beyond the 8 man MINIMUM requirement.
That is my take on it.- 4
-
13 minutes ago, Tuukka.R said:
Suggestion. Next time make story about new players who might be next superstars. Like Xdoumi etc. Now you're making storys about mid-level players. Sry for those who now thinks they are hidden gems. Peace and love.
Lamsa who made it to the Summer Cup finals this summer and now leading his team who no one believed in to the ELITE playoffs in front of several top ranked teams. Mid-level players? Take a step down please Tuukka.R.
Peace and love- 14
- 6
-
@Danielcadabra Maybe you could do a tutorial video on how you want us to capture and share? It's not that I dont understand your text, but I think that it could help to avoid confusion in some cases. It might also be a way to reach more of the Community, ultimately having more people sharing content (which is what we want right?), since I think that some people who might skip a text like this would maybe watch a video. But yeah, great initiative! I believe this is a great way for the Community to grow and get more notice - the best players certainly do some sick shit out there, that could eventually turn into some solid clickbait
Also, I work as a video editor professionally, so if you want any input/feedback/backup/help with this just let me know, I'd be happy to help- 5
LA Announcement: Certain Player Abilities to be banned in eHSM, SCL and ECL '23 Spring
in SportsGamer
Posted · Edited by LastMandalorian
Honestly - can't agree more.
The game is the game. Period. If you can't win one way - experiment with another. Or if you want to keep it completely fair - ban all abilities. Do LA consider themselves better developers than EA? Better at balancing? I guess time will tell.
Annoying that the lobby who pushed this through seem to have a monopoly on "how the game is supposed to be played" - and anything that differs is a threat to be eliminated. Whats next? Do you want to ban "Snipers" as well after the NA-(almost)sweep in the finals?
It's bullshit.