League Administration Rulings

"LA came to the conclusion that there will not be a ban for the player gzell60, nevertheless he was given a warning."

"Therefore we asked both teams to NOT perform any of the above mentioned actions for the remainder of this series. We also would like to point out that any further infraction of this rule will lead to a 1 game ban."

Care to explain the difference of the warning gzell received and the one given to both teams?

Quote

This is not a valid reason to postpone and refuse playing games.

Please add some kind of clarification of valid and invalid postponing reasons in the rulebook for the future, at least if you're going to say some reason was invalid. Imo it doesn't make sense to have valid and invalid reasons with this rulebook but I guess this is the direction where things are going

Edited February 13, 2019 by Mikka

One-game ban for taking a shot after the whistle can not go into the rulebook as is. It is quite an easy mistake to commit after an offside call (for example) and going by the book, you'd have to suspend players for it.

Slashing after the whistle & challenging a player to a fight you can't really do accidentally, so those are fine to include.

Why can't there just be punishment to that player who accepts the fight, in elite at least people know if you push the triangle it iniates the fight there is no reason ever to press triangle (ever). So if it's done by accident or even by magic everyone knows it's illegal and should prevent fights from hapoening

Not a fan either, especially the late shots thingy. Instead, make it clear that fighting is only disallowed for the acceptor (which seems to be people's favourite solution) instead of just saying "Players are not allowed to fight" like before.

It's not like this is the first time LA ever had to add more clarification to the rules in all these years

 

"BalkanRocket promised us, that he have enough guys ready to play and support him as the captain, that Dynamic will be finishing the season."

This is kinda fun when you already know that don't have enough support and that you already know Dynamic will not finnish the playoff then. I suggest that in future case you should listen to the players in the team. A captain can't play alone without the players.

What kind of captain even starts kicking players during playoff? I get that you can have disagreements with other players, but you still have the option of not letting all the guys play so there is no justification in kicking players.

The situation in terms of fighting in Dynamic might not resolve if Jaromir still is in the squad, but the situation do not have a bigger chance of resolving now since the captain have acted against the will of the majority of the team.

The ruling is wrong. If something, Balkan should be disqualified as C. At least for future tournaments.

 

Hey cmoon!

Shooting after whistle CAN NOT be against rules!!! It is no where near of the same thing as accepting a fight like @gzell60 did in this example case. Just look at these games and how many accidental mistakes we make....specially when talking about Lite games  Some of us have to sometimes play game sounds OFF, so there really can and will be accidental shots and punishing about acts like that makes absolutely no sense.

No penalty of fighting and forcing 2 CPU to the ice for at least 1/4 period. And then there is cases like this, where goalie tries to go after a puck and gets banned for 2 games. 

I must ask... where is the logic behind these punishments? Why that fight is worth just warning and why going after puck is worth 2 game ban? Please league admins, explain this... Thx.

Edited February 14, 2019 by ahonaattori

When will we get our first lockout?

Maybe NHLGamer should name a board, like a court where people can appeal against LA's decisions. Board would investigate the case again and it could have enough power for example to give a permit of exception of the existing rules so LA's can follow the rulebook precisely. The final decision would be made with a vote and the results of it would be public. Members of this court should be super neutral and have some knowledge of the past LA decisions so it's going to be hard to find them, maybe hire some lawyers 🤭.

Dunno, sounds maybe too much of work but imo it works pretty well in real life. Just in case if things gets worse. Not really sure if there's a need for this but it came to my mind while taking a dump.

Peace

• Actions that are leading to a fighting challenge will be disallowed as well as the fighting itself, including:
  • Challenging a player to fight after the whistle
  • Slashing players after the whistle
  • Late shots after the whistle

 

Dont ban two of these its ridiculous!

First as like Tbantti said late shots are easy mistake to make! 

Second Slashing players after the whistle is kinda part of playoff hockey  Trying to provoke opponent is atleast what I try do! Slashing is good tool for that. 

Only thing worth to ban is challenging players to fight after whistle, its most biggest threat to pick up a fight.

I hope LA will reconsider this because now its seems they are banning stuff from the game without further thinking.

Fighting is part of game. Lets all fight and let EA decide who will win

Hey Everyone,

In regards to the fighting rules, there might be some misunderstandings, so we want to clear this up in case we communicated it poorly:

• The changes to the rules have not been made - the implementation was only for the remainder of the DYN - DPH series.
• The above listed changes are examples - we are aware that many players would not like those things taken away by making them against the rules, which is why we are asking for your opinions on it.

For example, the only modification to the rule that could be made (if that is the general consensus) is that only the accepting party is breaking the rules and how to continue with the game if there is a fight.

Making any bigger changes to the fighting rules during the season would most likely cause confusion and that was not our intention in any case.

5 minutes ago, League Administration said:

Hey Everyone,

In regards to the fighting rules, there might be some misunderstandings, so we want to clear this up in case we communicated it poorly:

• The changes to the rules have not been made - the implementation was only for the remainder of the DYN - DPH series.
• The above listed changes are examples - we are aware that many players would not like those things taken away by making them against the rules, which is why we are asking for your opinions on it.

For example, the only modification to the rule that could be made (if that is the general consensus) is that only the accepting party is breaking the rules and how to continue with the game if there is a fight.

Making any bigger changes to the fighting rules during the season would most likely cause confusion and that was not our intention in any case.

Well atm the fighting rule is very vague, if it's broken LA can decide whatever they want and players can't tell beforehand if they have broken any rules

vor 16 Minuten schrieb Lauri:

Well atm the fighting rule is very vague, if it's broken LA can decide whatever they want and players can't tell beforehand if they have broken any rules

I remember our Twitter conversation from 2 days ago where you did not sound like the fighting rule is "very vague" and ended it by calling it "pointless". How come?

12 minutes ago, gzell60 said:

I remember our Twitter conversation from 2 days ago where you did not sound like the fighting rule is "very vague" and ended it by calling it "pointless". How come?

Vague as in LA can decide whatever they want

13 minutes ago, gzell60 said:

I remember our Twitter conversation from 2 days ago where you did not sound like the fighting rule is "very vague" and ended it by calling it "pointless". How come?

For any sane person it would be the one pressing the triangle should be held accountable, but as LA demonstrated it's not

Where is the time, when it was just a game, where we all take a break, realx, fun. But now only problems and misunderstanding each other, blaming, frustraiting and complaining! 😌
Boys and girls be nice to each other and don't tilt and frustrate! 😄

Best regards, Rocky#15

@jurisc1989 thx for your words, if longer people was and play here, they forgot it's just a Game to have fun and relax together. For sure we got and need Rules, but if we start to be piggy for every small thing, we must make Rules longer than our hole live. 

Don't forget we wanna have fun together, and have a nice break from our stressful days at work and....😊

Edited February 14, 2019 by CzE Toni

7 hours ago, Tauri said:

When will we get our first lockout?

NHL15.

When everyone is motivated to play the playoff and suddenly changed there minds because of kicking a player that was going to far. That just backs up everything I've said to LA.

That just clarify that you weren't motivated to play it in the first place.

10 hours ago, Jesus said:

What kind of captain even starts kicking players during playoff? I get that you can have disagreements with other players, but you still have the option of not letting all the guys play so there is no justification in kicking players.

The situation in terms of fighting in Dynamic might not resolve if Jaromir still is in the squad, but the situation do not have a bigger chance of resolving now since the captain have acted against the will of the majority of the team.

The ruling is wrong. If something, Balkan should be disqualified as C. At least for future tournaments.

 

The majority of the team wanted to play the playoff and i made so they could do that and now they doesn't want to do that anymore. 

So for him making a A-captain give him the Captain and not let my play then would resolve it? That ruling is better then? No, I rather kick him then make that happen.

I play goalie so even If I would bench myself we still have enough players to play but if they refuse to play then thats clearly isn't my fault.

 

6 hours ago, eliekamel87 said:

You speak our minds Jesus.

The problem wasn't the player who ended up getting kicked, never was and the majority of our members reached our to LA to explain that.

The fact that LA buries their heads in to the rule book instead of taking in the whole situation before taking the Captains side is hard to accept. We try to do everything right (except wanting to change C sooner) and our REAL leader gets kicked and we lack players to continue.

We respect and appreciate NHLgamers LA in general, this is nothing against then, we just feel that this decision was made purely by reading rule book and not taking in the whole situation. 

 

/ Players of Dynamic

Didn't you say to @Kenu that "it's easier for a outsider to have opinion."

Yeah, it sure is and still you say that he speaks your mind. Well, he doesn't since you changed your mind after the ruling.

Edited February 14, 2019 by BalkanRocket

I wonder why these things keep on happen around Basse? 😃