Leaderboard

Free forward/D looking for team for upcoming ECL etc. Played last ECL in Reality Check in pro. Contact me here or psn. 🙂

33yo Finnish Dude ( RW / rd ) looking for team Pro/Lite... back-up role may be fine too. Maybe can try LW too... I am not that chatty in English parties, but i can communicate in English so English speaking teams are ok. For tryouts send PM here or PSN ahonaattori

#AllianceToElite

Free lw/c for ecl 9 backup is fine

Free goalie looking for a team for next ecl pro or elite and other tournaments. Contact me here or in psn:Randomjanne

Up.

Up

Up

😴

Jou. Free ultimate backup left or right. Nonni amikset, ultimaattinen koppipelaaja tarjolla porukan täytteeks. Ei tietenkåän tarvi roolia ecl:s mut vetää keijojen puuttees ihan mitä vaa paikkaa kadehtittaval tasol. Hyvä urpo whatsapis ja muutenkin miellyttävä torsti. Psn: Saippua

Uppista

Uppista :))

Free LW/RW! Looking for an elite or a pro team. My previous team was TIKI TALK. I'm able to play almost every night. Act quickly and ask for tryouts! https://nhlgamer.com/player.php?playerID=2534

Is there a problem with setting up new teams? should we do something about the twist that is when "experienced" players set up new Teams? Should there be more focus on "organization" thinking at the pro and elite levels? i don't think the team that comes new to the scene has a problem starting at lite level. could we limit the formation of new pro-level gangs through license fees? "Professional license" for pro and elite teams which is paid once ? And everytime if u make new team u need start to lite i think That is important . i dont know how ”license payments” will work but i think NHL Gamer need money to give us to more ”professional vr hockey ” happenings in future . I love seeing several teams in this scene that have been around for years. that's where we need to take this scene: towards "more professional" gaming i think 3 division is good maybe 4 if needed but we need do something to players who allways rebuild teams

Up

Pääseekö kännis maalii?

Let's not get silly here. Wasn't this like the whole point of my previous post? Basically there is no fool proof way to determine in which division each team should begin. Therefore it'd be great not to have too many divisions as it can be a real route of suffering for those who are new but good, or have developed a lot during the off-season. This could work. I think we should also increase the amount of teams being relegated to Lite and promoted to Pro, no matter if we extend the Pro division or not. This way we wouldn't have Pro level teams being stuck in Lite because there are too many of them competing against each other. Especially by extending Pro to 48 we could even do something as radical as promoting and relegating 12 teams in a season, which is 1/4 of the division, just like 4/16 in Elite. You could have 1 or 2 teams with least points being relegated automatically, then let the rest play a 7 game series for the promotion/relegation. That way we would know for sure who belongs to Pro and who doesn't. This way we could also throw all the new teams into Lite (if we want to implement a rule like that) and they would get promoted for sure after their first season if they are top-Pro/Elite -caliber.

No offense, but the fact is that Elite wouldn't be elite if there would be like 24 or 32 teams. Same thing with Pro. Right now the most of our teams in this scene are Pro/Lite teams, not Elite so it would make zero sense to grow Elite only because there's more lower level teams these days. And if someone bases their opinion on a day dream where every lower level team would magically be Elite/High pro - then you can keep on day dreaming. And this is not me being a dick, just saying how it is as someone needs to say it out loud (with KingofApes). Haven't changed anything? Um, the value of first three divisions would obviously grow and the match schedule would be partly the same for the top three divisions. Elite 16, Pro 32, Lite 32, The Rest XX (the hungry, the ugly and the dads). This system would be as competitive as it ever could be for top80 teams which is about the same amount of teams NHLGamer had in it's first division season (ECL4). How's that no progress? I get that some people would like to have every possible team in the higher level but at that point the whole reason of having divisions would pretty much disappear.

This is it - the organizing. And to answer your real question; there should be time for that! I know that the people who run this shit (Kenu & friends) are not doing this for big money or anything like that, but NHL19 was pretty succesful what it comes to possibility to play competitive hockey in NHLGamer. However, we haven't seen any ECL hockey since March and that fucking sucks. For me this has always been a problem: the last big tourney of an NHL game ends around March, and the next major level tournament starts six months later in late October, and then we have six months (with breaks included) to play those two tournaments. This is not KHL. If there's never going to be three ECL's which some people want here - we should keep these two current main leagues far away from each other. What I'm saying is that if we start the first ECL in October, the next ECL after that should definitely start in the next March - not end there. Like, how about if we keep those blahblah (Spring League.. never again pls) and these native (FCL, SCL) tourneys between these two major tourneys, or/and during the summer. Spring League -> Summer League and if/when the Summer Cup has to be there too, keep that shit shorter instead of important leagues. For me atleast it would be cool as hell to start and end the NHL gaming year with ECL. Also maybe that's how the gamers would stay more motivated during the long year. For an example, even though your team do shit in the first ECL and then in the native tourney you do little bit better but still fail, you still have the third shot in the Spring time ECL. Oops, little offtopic but I got nothing better to do so whatever...

In my opinion saying that it takes too long for new teams to get to Elite from, say the new "Semi-Pro", is a weak argument. Why should we give new teams to do so much less work to earn a spot with the best? We should put some value on those teams who have been together for long periods of time and working their asses off to get there. If you want to start a new team, you should not get everything on a golden platter. I would be okay if I'd form a new team, to start from the lowest division of the possible 4. And for individuals, everyone should recognize the hard work there too. If you got the skills and the eye for the game, good teams and good captains will notice. Just work your butt off to get a spot for a tryout and show what you got. Somebody said earlier in the thread: " Nothing worth having comes easy". Look at HAVU, Flyerkungen has bust his balls off to make that dream come true, it did not come in a matter of couple of months. And I am pretty sure that last year when Eki won it all, he put in the work there.

Give this guy a try on RD. Solid!

Butterfly Effect 🦋 We are looking for Goalie upcoming ECL & other tournaments. Maybe starting goalie, maybe second. It’s up to you. Contact me here or PSN 🌚