Leaderboard

Kaupallinen yhteistyö In: hvaliranta88 out :Friilander

Free LW/C, tonight is tradedeadline for lite/pro. Contact me here. Im back 🤮 Maybe🙄

RPEAT esports In: Friilander from kaupallinen yhteistyö

Pata Hellalla In: Johtajavirtanen (Färjestad BK)

With the game being as uncompetitive as it is, and having matches where even the most lopsided matches can be taken to overtime on such a regular basis, we should never have a 3-2-1-0 point system. Otherwise we'd have bunch of underdog teams stealing singular points from the top teams just by placing a bus in front of their net through out regulation and going for harpoon attacks. It could also result into a situation in which the better teams would have to go for all out attack to secure full 3 points after playing a very frustrating even game, just to get downed to 0 points due to last minute bounces and other cheesy plays. If we want to encourage teams to be active and play as aggressively through out the game as they would in the first period, we'd have to consider 2-0 point system in which the winner gets 2 points and loser gets 0 despite whether the game is decided in regulation or OT. Anyhow, there would be certain faults with this system as well.

Prowlers Esport in: heligajudas Xbox master from FA in: xSniga84 from Puliveivarit (Neo) Welcome to team boys!!!!!

Free RW looking for finnish team! Can play RD/LW but prefer playing on right side. Backup role is fine too. Ready for tryouts ofc. Lite/Pro Contact me on psn: Kkarkass

Free rd elite/pro

A win is a win. I think it would be wrong to cut off points for an OTW, especially when the game lasts 15min.

Basic Instinct In: - Youngbulis (Afrodunk) - Vamoux (The UnderRated) - rightinkarlsson (FA) - JungledHd (FA) Out: - Zani87

Not sure a 3 point system awards attacking. On the opposite I do believe the team that has the one goal lead plays even more defensive in order to protect those points. There is a charm to that as well but not sure it leads to more goals. OT is also in general less exciting since both teams already lost one point each. Think 2 point system is good since there is a playoff as well. Makes the group stage a bit tighter.

Up

Arctic Blaze In: - Saskipoeka00 from Me Carvoset

We got 2/4 points tonight against Riven Johdolla, GGs! MVP: @Timez

Ladies and gentlemen, our latest signup: @Frilander!!

Best post in this thread right here.

Sack brothers in: @KXnet1b from angry cats

Infamous in - pepcastachurcik

Skellefteå AIK in: Edvviniho From: Enköping HKS

Bahamas Mamas (Neo) Out: Koomalaine In: epelis

I don't really care which way points are counted as the better teams will still prevail and the worse teams won't. I don't really know if the assumption that "teams play it safe" is correct either. If it is an even match-up with teams battling for the same position, why would you want to give points to the opponent rather than deny them of points by winning in regular time? And if the skill gap is bigger (top vs bottom), the worse team would still try to salvage at least a point. One solid argument for a 3p win is that there would be the same amount of points up for grabs in each game, regardless of whether or not it goes to OT. But as I said, I'm indifferent on the topic.

IN Foppatofflan Enerfity

Sack brothers looking for 2nd g we can offer you 50/50 normal games and also ecl games

Free f looking for finnish speaking ECL team. https://nhlgamer.com/players/2622 PSN: santeerii

Fysical In: @Jjmakkeli & @Limbe65 from Kaupallinen Yhteistyö welcome back boys🔥🏒

But adding a point to regular win isn't cutting off anything it only adds a point.